You should be bullet proof if someone complains to the FCC the test is not accurate, since that’s the one they use.
From: Chuck McCown Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:13 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance Interesting, source code too. From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 9:11 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance https://www.samknows.com/ From: Chuck McCown Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 9:33 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance It has to be something on someone else’s network. It has to withstand allegations that we cooked the tests. From: Simon Westlake Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 8:22 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance There are a lot of tools out there like this, they are used a ton by carriers/mobile providers etc for testing site to site. Not horribly-super expensive (few hundred bucks for the device), but you have to provide the endpoint to test to. I've used Ixia for this in the past, something like http://www.ixiacom.com/products/ixchariot but it is probably slightly more expensive. On 8/5/2015 9:19 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: I need a client that I can place at a customer location that periodically does a stress test and logs the results.� Like to know CIR of up and down as well as latency.�� Need to have it work with something like speedtest or something else not on our network.�
