Yeah, this is really cool. Hadn't seen it before. Looks like you have to
sign up and hope for the best though.
On 8/5/2015 11:17 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
You should be bullet proof if someone complains to the FCC the test is
not accurate, since that�s the one they use.
*From:* Chuck McCown <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2015 11:13 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance
Interesting, source code too.
*From:* Ken Hohhof <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2015 9:11 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance
https://www.samknows.com/
*From:* Chuck McCown <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2015 9:33 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance
It has to be something on someone else�s network. It has to withstand
allegations that we cooked the tests.
*From:* Simon Westlake <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 05, 2015 8:22 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Proving performance
There are a lot of tools out there like this, they are used a ton by
carriers/mobile providers etc for testing site to site. Not
horribly-super expensive (few hundred bucks for the device), but you
have to provide the endpoint to test to.
I've used Ixia for this in the past, something like
http://www.ixiacom.com/products/ixchariot but it is probably slightly
more expensive.
On 8/5/2015 9:19 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
I need a client that I can place at a customer location that
periodically does a stress test and logs the results.� Like to know
CIR of up and down as well as latency.�� Need to have it work
with something like speedtest or something else not on our network.�
