PowerBeam AC looks like a nice product if 5150-5250 is ever unlocked and EIRP 
limits are revealed.  SOON!

From: Craig House 
Sent: Sunday, August 09, 2015 7:50 AM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

Never used microtik radios so lack of experience there.  As far as UBNT AC they 
were not available when we did this link and I got the link as a door prize at 
AF.  Also I have tried AC links and I don't see substantially more bandwidth in 
real tcp throughput on them vs eptp   I think we got 115 mb each way but they 
are using much larger dishes.  I have to say the ac stuff is nice though from 
what I've seen so far 

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 9, 2015, at 07:08, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote:


  What is the appeal of using ePTP vs. a Mikrotik (or UBNT) AC product with a 
lot more BW in the same channel size?

   

  Paul

   

  From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig House
  Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:03 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

   

  EPTP

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 4:53:35 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

   

  Tdd ptp or eptp?

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Aug 8, 2015 5:37 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote:

  I have a pair of unsynced 5Ghz on Force dishes that I put up in April.  They 
run pretty much flawlessly.  They are 4 miles apart and push around 80mb each 
way in a 20mhz channel.  No complaints.   Other than the crappy design of the 
dish which I would have tossed off the tower when I was installing it if I had 
an alternative.

   

  Craig

   

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]>
  To: "af" <[email protected]>
  Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 3:50:51 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

   

  +1 about.

   

  So I assume we'll see about half the current latency with 2.5 msec? I can 
live with that for most links.

   

  On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
wrote:

  Thanks for the confirmation.  And on a Saturday!!!




   

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

   

  On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Dan Sullivan 
<[email protected]> wrote:

  2.5 msec frame allows for sync and improves PTP latency as compared to 5 msec 
frame.

   

  ePTP cannot be synced as communication is driven based on dynamic data from 
each link.


  Dan Sullivan

  ePMP Software Manager

   

  From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard
  Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:11 AM
  To: af
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

   

  Yep, I'm pretty sure it doesn't use fixed frames in ePTP mode... trying to 
sync that sounds like it'd end up like airmax sync.

  2.5ms frames make sync a lot more useful for ptp though.

   

  On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
wrote:

  But that depends on frame timing which would leave you at the current tdd ptp 
(5ms today, 2.5ms after 2.5).  I'd love to see the 2ms latency be synced but I 
don't see how that would be doable.

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Aug 8, 2015 7:54 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:

  No, I mean exactly what I said ePTP sync.

  There's no reason that I'm aware of that the ePTP up\down cycles couldn't be 
synced. The regular sync has to deal with potentially dozens of clients. The 
ePTP just has to deal with one.



  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:48:14 AM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

  Eptp sync doesn't sound possible.  That's what the tdd ptp is for.  Do you 
mean the 2.5ms timing?

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Aug 8, 2015 7:47 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote:

  Though*  Early in the morning...



  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:45:55 AM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

  Is it, thought?  ;-)


  FWIW, I have some ePTP up (eagerly awaiting ePTP sync!) and no issues that 
I'm aware of.



  -----
  Mike Hammett
  Intelligent Computing Solutions
  http://www.ics-il.com

   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
  To: [email protected]
  Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 4:41:45 PM
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all?

  How long has it been up?  According to Cambium I'm the only one that's been 
experiencing a bug and it's all over the place.  They've got a fix for it but 
it's just so weird that I'm the only one with the problem =/




   

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

   

  On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote:

  Yep, I just replaced a pair of NanoBridges with Force 110's doing ePTP a 
couple days ago and we have at least one other.

   

  On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> 
wrote:

  Anyone at all?


   

  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

   

Reply via email to