Never used microtik radios so lack of experience there. As far as UBNT AC they were not available when we did this link and I got the link as a door prize at AF. Also I have tried AC links and I don't see substantially more bandwidth in real tcp throughput on them vs eptp I think we got 115 mb each way but they are using much larger dishes. I have to say the ac stuff is nice though from what I've seen so far
Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 9, 2015, at 07:08, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > What is the appeal of using ePTP vs. a Mikrotik (or UBNT) AC product with a > lot more BW in the same channel size? > > Paul > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Craig House > Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 6:03 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > EPTP > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 4:53:35 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > Tdd ptp or eptp? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Aug 8, 2015 5:37 PM, "Craig House" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a pair of unsynced 5Ghz on Force dishes that I put up in April. They > run pretty much flawlessly. They are 4 miles apart and push around 80mb each > way in a 20mhz channel. No complaints. Other than the crappy design of the > dish which I would have tossed off the tower when I was installing it if I > had an alternative. > > Craig > > > From: "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> > To: "af" <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 3:50:51 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > +1 about. > > So I assume we'll see about half the current latency with 2.5 msec? I can > live with that for most links. > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > Thanks for the confirmation. And on a Saturday!!! > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Dan Sullivan > <[email protected]> wrote: > 2.5 msec frame allows for sync and improves PTP latency as compared to 5 msec > frame. > > ePTP cannot be synced as communication is driven based on dynamic data from > each link. > > Dan Sullivan > ePMP Software Manager > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mathew Howard > Sent: Saturday, August 08, 2015 10:11 AM > To: af > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > Yep, I'm pretty sure it doesn't use fixed frames in ePTP mode... trying to > sync that sounds like it'd end up like airmax sync. > > 2.5ms frames make sync a lot more useful for ptp though. > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > But that depends on frame timing which would leave you at the current tdd ptp > (5ms today, 2.5ms after 2.5). I'd love to see the 2ms latency be synced but > I don't see how that would be doable. > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Aug 8, 2015 7:54 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > No, I mean exactly what I said ePTP sync. > > There's no reason that I'm aware of that the ePTP up\down cycles couldn't be > synced. The regular sync has to deal with potentially dozens of clients. The > ePTP just has to deal with one. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:48:14 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > Eptp sync doesn't sound possible. That's what the tdd ptp is for. Do you > mean the 2.5ms timing? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Aug 8, 2015 7:47 AM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: > Though* Early in the morning... > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > From: "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Saturday, August 8, 2015 6:45:55 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > Is it, thought? ;-) > > > FWIW, I have some ePTP up (eagerly awaiting ePTP sync!) and no issues that > I'm aware of. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 4:41:45 PM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Is anyone here doing ePTP at all? > > How long has it been up? According to Cambium I'm the only one that's been > experiencing a bug and it's all over the place. They've got a fix for it but > it's just so weird that I'm the only one with the problem =/ > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > Yep, I just replaced a pair of NanoBridges with Force 110's doing ePTP a > couple days ago and we have at least one other. > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > Anyone at all? > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > > > > > > >
