Well, SAF responded quickly to my query on this, I havent had a chance to test it but since the path instead of radio to radio it would be radio1 router1 radio1 radio2 router2 radio2 I think the delay would be negligible
By default service packets are running only with 1 hop TTL limit, which is radio <-> radio and these packets are running only on WAN ports, in case if your network topology can't be configured as standard design and requires custom configuration approx. like this: MNG (192.168.100.10) -> ROUTER (192.168.100.1|192.168.205.1)-> Lumina_local (192.168.205.10)-> Lumina_remote (192.168.200.11)-> Router (192.168.200.1|192.168.xxx.xxx) configuration should be done in such manner: 1) In command line (WEB GUI: Tools->Command line) enter: "modem ipremote off" on both radios; 2) Go to "IP Configuration" page, specify IP addresses and gateways on both radios, as required by network design. Specify IP address of remote unit in "Remote IP address" field on both radios. Make sure that you have access to both radios WEB GUI; 3) In command line enter "net mngttl <hop count>" on both radios. To avoid excess service packets in your network you need to enter the exact count of hops from one side to other plus one (CFIP Lumina); 4) Test setup and save configuration on both radios; On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 4:22 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote: > well shit > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Vlad Sedov <v...@atlasok.com> wrote: > >> Yup, they talk to each other via IP. We ran into the same thing with our >> SAFs.. Kinda silly, I think. >> >> Vlad >> >> >> On 8/7/2015 3:31 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >> >> Aligning a SAF link, its up, passing traffic, just neither side is >> displaying the remote info, config is thesame as our other saf link that it >> is displaying, with the exception that the working one both radios are on >> the same subnet, this one they are on serarate /30. do the pull remote side >> data via ip, or am i missing something here >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
