i dont think anyone here has ever been able to monitor throughput that i recall. I tried the .0 witht he counter, still a 0 (powercode)
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts > graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs. > > Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface > OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit > to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1.2.1.2 would tell you if the standard > stuff is there. That's dumb if it's not. > > It's not. > > Or the interfaces in the if-mib are virtual interfaces that are not > showing actual traffic....or something. Hard to remember. > > > > On 9/15/2015 10:36 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > half those would never graph: for example > > danEthRxTotalBytes > <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html#danEthRxTotalBytes> > Object > ID: 1.3.1.4.1.32584.1.8.13.5 > Total number of bytes received. > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Colin Stanners < <[email protected]> > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Do you want it from the AP >> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html> >> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html >> Or the CPEs? >> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.Motorola-CPE-PRIVATE-MIB.html >> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on >>> these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the basics rssi, cinr 1 >>> cinr 2 etc. Any ethernet stats would be nice. >>> >>> RIght know we have random loss to the subs, im guessing its something to >>> do with some interference, But it could boil down to a saturated AP, and so >>> far as I have been able to tell you cant monitor throughput on these trash >>> cans other than monitoring the ethernet of the connected device >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
