What about AP On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 8:26 AM, Eric Muehleisen <[email protected]> wrote:
> SM: > > Traffic In: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.3.0 > Traffic Out: .1.3.6.1.4.1.10529.300.1.2.2.0 > > Pulled straight from Cacti. Works like a champ. > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 6:51 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > >> They definitely do not support IF-MIB. >> >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:56 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Try putting a .0 at the end of that OID and see if it then starts >>> graphing. That's common with a lot of OIDs. >>> >>> Also, how the hell would they not support the standard IF-MIB interface >>> OID tree. I assume you've tried that anyway. I don't have any of that shit >>> to test against. A walk of .1.3.6.1.2.1.2 would tell you if the standard >>> stuff is there. That's dumb if it's not. >>> >>> On 9/15/2015 10:36 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >>> >>> half those would never graph: for example >>> >>> danEthRxTotalBytes >>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html#danEthRxTotalBytes> >>> Object >>> ID: 1.3.1.4.1.32584.1.8.13.5 >>> Total number of bytes received. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:31 PM, Colin Stanners <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Do you want it from the AP >>>> <http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html> >>>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.DAN-BASIC-MIB-ADMIN.html >>>> Or the CPEs? >>>> http://support.cambiumnetworks.com/framed/onlinetools/content.Motorola-CPE-PRIVATE-MIB.html >>>> >>>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 10:16 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I need to know OIDS (numeric) that can be monitored successfully on >>>>> these pieces of shit. Im stuck with it. We have the basics rssi, cinr 1 >>>>> cinr 2 etc. Any ethernet stats would be nice. >>>>> >>>>> RIght know we have random loss to the subs, im guessing its something >>>>> to do with some interference, But it could boil down to a saturated AP, >>>>> and >>>>> so far as I have been able to tell you cant monitor throughput on these >>>>> trash cans other than monitoring the ethernet of the connected device >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >>> >>> >> > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
