Doug Hass will give you they Heebie Jeebies if he decides to weigh in on the question.

That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
In defense of said employee, if the employee approaches the employer asking for training in a particular area specifically to expand service offerings, if the employer declines because the benefit of the service isn't great enough to justify the expense of the training, then the employee is not competing against the employer if they go out on their own and invest the time and money as long as they aren't doing it on the employers time. Unless there were a carefully crafted no compete contract in place. But att hat point it would pretty much have to state employee cant have a second job, which I don't think can be enforced by a contract.

Does the IRS care who is paying taxes as long as they're getting paid, even if the income is from two sources at the same time? At the end of the day they only care about the dollars not hours earning them don't they? assumptions about the IRS never turn out well.

If a contract were present where the subcontracted employee specifically assumes the liability, does that protect the employer from that risk, if the employer is who ultimately bills the customer? (I know everybody can sue anybody for anything, but as a rule of thumb) This is assuming the contracted employee wants to assume the liability for the work performed. My guess is if there is any payment for service as an employee for the work performed, the employer as a company cant get rid of the liability.






On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Paul McCall <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Steve is really a IRS agent that is trolling !

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof
    *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 12:23 PM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Contracting an employee

    Why do I suspect Steve is the employee in this story?

    *From:*Daniel White <mailto:[email protected]>

    *Sent:*Tuesday, September 22, 2015 10:23 AM

    *To:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>

    *Subject:*Re: [AFMUG] Contracting an employee

    Well Steve was pretty vague on this.

    Here is a good example.  When SAF moved into both of their
    locations in Denver I did all of the structured cabling work.
    Clearly outside my job description, and I did it on my own time
(well as an exempt employee, not sure that really exists :-). Company paid me a bonus, and they paid less than a contractor
    coming in and doing the work.  Win-win for everyone.

Of course Steve said the work would be done during normal hours. But once again, if you show your employees that if they go above
    and beyond and you will reward that (say getting a degree or
    learning new skills) that isn’t a bad thing overall. Makes your
    employees want to grow with your company – not get a degree and go
    seek higher pay somewhere else.

    Maybe if the work will be useful long term, just add the work to
    the employees normal course of work and give them a raise.

    Thank you,

    Daniel White

    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>__

    Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 <tel:%2B1%20%28303%29%20746-3590>

    Skype: danieldwhite
    Social: LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84>:
    Twitter <https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84>

    *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman
    *Sent:* Tuesday, September 22, 2015 7:51 AM
    *To:* Animal Farm <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
    *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Contracting an employee

    Wow. Massive can of worms opened. With the current attitude of
    most employees I think it won't be long before the employee
    believes his $10 an hour is more like a retainer to show up and be
    available to bill you $50 an hour for anything he does. I think I
    would fire him and contract him for $50 when I needed him. You
    might be surprised how seldom that is, and so would he.

    On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 12:16 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm
    <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

        So if you have an employee who offers a service that you do
        not, but works a 40 on your clock how would you handle
        subcontracting his services on your clock? Just for easy
        numbers, say he's a ten dollar employee, but he bills at
        fifty. You need his services during business hours. You need
        to bill for it.  Aside from the obvious separation issues, is
        this really all that complicated if you have an attendance
        policy this would interfere with?  If he's on your dime as an
        employee, but also billing his contracted rate, say you're ok
        with the double dipping, where does the liability for the
        service lay? From the customers perspective, I assume it's
        simply on the boss. But at the end of the day, how would you
        handle, or not handle that, concessions to attendance? How do
        you deal with the other employees, or is it any of their
        concern? As a subcontractor, I assume you can make it sort of
        the contract that 'll work is represented as the employer



--
    Lewis Bergman

    325-439-0533 <tel:325-439-0533> Cell

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Avast logo <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>

        

    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
    www.avast.com <https://www.avast.com/antivirus>




--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

Reply via email to