I wouldn't say last resort... You're far more independent of external
things breaking your link if your FOB has, let's say, a 2.4m flyaway X-band
VSAT. The only thing you need is a reliable source of electricity.

Where I have seen tropo used is to establish a secondary or tertiary link
to the nearest larger base.

The US DoD spends an ungodly amount of money on a myriad of types of COTS
and military specific geostationary SATCOM.
On Sep 28, 2015 8:00 PM, "David Milholen" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I know DOD will still use those older tropos for a last resort and in a
> theater of ops the will deploy
> what assets are need and other times anything available for deployment.
> We had more than 4 ways of coms off of the FOB we were on. Not including
> civilian sat.
>
>
> On 9/28/2015 7:00 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>
> yes   do......
>
> on other note....haven't hear much discussion of OTH microwave links
> anymore.  Still used or not?
>
> Jaime Solorza
> Wireless Systems Architect
> 915-861-1390
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Jay Weekley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Enjoy conversations with your dad while you can.
>>
>> David wrote:
>>
>>> Well, Given my dad gets to visit once a week at my place of work is
>>> great.
>>> I could not ask for anything better than having a good conversation with
>>> my dad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 09/28/2015 02:08 PM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>>>
>>>> Damn, remind me not to take you out on the town if that is your idea of
>>>> a good time ;)
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 1:51 PM, David <[email protected] <mailto:
>>>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Ok,
>>>>      Dad and I were having a discussion today about some historical
>>>>     microwave communications and my experience with the old tropos
>>>> system
>>>>     the army had. Here is a link to what we were talking about :)
>>>>
>>>> http://www.radartutorial.eu/08.transmitters/Traveling%20Wave%20Tube.en.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Lewis Bergman
>>>> 325-439-0533 Cell
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
>

Reply via email to