I've wondered about that too, back when we first started doing PPPoE with MT, we were doing far slower connections, but the settings are still the same... it's entirely possible that a different Queue type would work better at the sort of speeds we're doing these days.
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > It may be something everyone should be doing everywhere, I don't know. > It's possible, perhaps even likely that the MT default PPPoE settings > aren't optimal. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:41:56 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types > > The advice may or may not apply. But if your issue is between Ubnt/MT I > don't know if I'd take ePMP documentation to be fixing the issue. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Bad advice to assume that if you're not using ePMP then it doesn't apply. >> I don't know, but perhaps that's a general best practice that we should be >> using across more vendors. Cambium sure isn't going to tell you how to >> tweak your UBNT wireless etup. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Sent: *Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:35:05 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types >> >> >> Well if you're not using ePMP that documentation really doesn't apply... >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Saw in the ePMP knowledge base that they recommend changing queue type >>> from default to wireless-default. >>> >>> In one of my mikrotik pppoe servers I look and see default is pfifo >>> with 50 packets. Wireless-default is sfq with 5s and 1514bytes. >>> >>> What would advantages or reason for the change? >>> >>> I don't user epmp yet but on my PPPoE server I frequently have >>> complaints from users that have there upstream maxed out by one thing >>> or another complain about there connection. I wander if switching to >>> sfq might help there? Or it might simply max my Mikrotik CPUs out. >>> >> >> >> > >
