SFQ works the best for speeds about 4 megs (thats not scientific on the 4 megs). PFIFO is more random than SFQ. I always tell folks there is more math involved with SFQ. And more math in figuring out bits is better right? hehe.
Seriously, SFQ performs better. You just don’t see how much better it performs until you are queing multi megs of traffic. Justin Wilson [email protected] --- http://www.mtin.net Owner/CEO xISP Solutions- Consulting – Data Centers - Bandwidth http://www.midwest-ix.com COO/Chairman Internet Exchange - Peering - Distributed Fabric > On Sep 30, 2015, at 1:55 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've wondered about that too, back when we first started doing PPPoE with MT, > we were doing far slower connections, but the settings are still the same... > it's entirely possible that a different Queue type would work better at the > sort of speeds we're doing these days. > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > It may be something everyone should be doing everywhere, I don't know. It's > possible, perhaps even likely that the MT default PPPoE settings aren't > optimal. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:41:56 AM > > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types > > The advice may or may not apply. But if your issue is between Ubnt/MT I > don't know if I'd take ePMP documentation to be fixing the issue. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Bad advice to assume that if you're not using ePMP then it doesn't apply. I > don't know, but perhaps that's a general best practice that we should be > using across more vendors. Cambium sure isn't going to tell you how to tweak > your UBNT wireless etup. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com <http://www.ics-il.com/> > > From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2015 10:35:05 AM > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Mikrotik Queue Types > > > Well if you're not using ePMP that documentation really doesn't apply... > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Matt <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Saw in the ePMP knowledge base that they recommend changing queue type > from default to wireless-default. > > In one of my mikrotik pppoe servers I look and see default is pfifo > with 50 packets. Wireless-default is sfq with 5s and 1514bytes. > > What would advantages or reason for the change? > > I don't user epmp yet but on my PPPoE server I frequently have > complaints from users that have there upstream maxed out by one thing > or another complain about there connection. I wander if switching to > sfq might help there? Or it might simply max my Mikrotik CPUs out. > > > > >
