Because that's the only way to get >5Mbps upload on a Home/Smallbiz
connection from someone other than $WORK.
Why so much upload? Because sometimes getting a file from here to there 10x
faster means I can fix a problem/complete maintenance and go to sleep
faster.
Why a /29? Keep work, home, etc totally separate.
Why home on a backup connection? Have you tried to concentrate on fixing
something when wife/so doesn't have netflix/facebook?

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Darin Steffl <[email protected]>
wrote:

> If it's just a backup connection, why do you have so much bandwidth with
> Frontier? Why not just use their 7/1M package for $49.99 a month?
>
> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:40 PM, Jon Auer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, I'm paying ~$180/mo for my Frontier DSL @40M/10M + static /29.
>> That's my "just in case backup" if my primary 40/40M connection via
>> myself goes down.
>> It's solid. I'm paying through the nose for it for the upload and because
>> Charter's always doing maintenance when I'm trying to do maintenance.
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "absurd"... ha. They make it sound like it's a total of $53.78 for both
>>> DSL lines. If that's the case, it's hardly absurd... in fact, I'd say it's
>>> a pretty darn good deal for where he is - assuming they actually work,
>>> which I admit is questionable judging from what I've heard from other
>>> Frontier DSL customers.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Seth Mattinen <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/1/15 09:33, James Howard wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/cable-company-charges-man-117000-for-internet-to-extend-network-2015-9
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> "Marshall pays an absurd $53.78 for two DSL lines"
>>>>
>>>> Wow. Whoever mentioned the whining about costing more than $29.99 was
>>>> spot on. Are you a wizard?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Darin Steffl
> Minnesota WiFi
> www.mnwifi.com
> 507-634-WiFi
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi> Like us on Facebook
> <http://www.facebook.com/minnesotawifi>
>

Reply via email to