Use a 44MM AA cannon LOL
On 10/07/2015 04:13 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
If they had to follow existing aircraft rules, perfect with the caveat
of them being over private property without consent, you should be
able to destroy them
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I have the complete opposite position. Not trolling, that's just
how I feel. Apply existing regulations where appropriate. Nothing
new is required.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"That One Guy /sarcasm" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
*To: *[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent: *Wednesday, October 7, 2015 3:31:29 PM
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] FAA levies $1.9 M civil penalty
good, I hope they go bankrupt. These drones need to get reigned
in, and it needs to be legal to shoot them down. Assholes have
been disrespectful with these things from day one
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The Federal Aviation Administration wants to levy the “largest
civil penalty” it has proposed against an unmanned aircraft
system operator “for endangering the safety of our airspace”
by operating drones in a “careless or reckless manner,” the
agency said in a Tuesday announcement. The proposed $1.9
million civil penalty against SkyPan International of Chicago
alleges that between March 21, 2012, and Dec. 15, 2014, SkyPan
conducted 65 unauthorized operations “in some of our most
congested airspace and heavily populated cities [including
New York City and Chicago], violating airspace regulations and
various operating rules,” the FAA said. The flights involved
aerial photography, and the aircraft were “not equipped with a
two-way radio, transponder, and altitude-reporting equipment,”
the FAA said. SkyPan also failed to obtain a certificate of
waiver or authorization for the operations, the release said.
SkyPan has 30 days to respond to the FAA’s enforcement letter,
it said. SkyPan didn’t have an immediate comment.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see
your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of
the team.
--
If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your
team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
