Seeing as everything is connectorized at this point, I guess there's not really anything stopping us from using h/v antennas. Of course that's still doesn't give us many options... Ubnt and itelite are about the only dual pol 900 antennas I can think of. On Oct 13, 2015 5:49 PM, "George Skorup" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I would rather have the style we're used to: MCX to N-male pigtails coming > out of the bottom of the case. However, if you saw their dual-slant yagi > which has two RP-SMA connectors on it and a provision for mounting the SM > to the back of it, I can see why they're coming out of the top. The folded > dipoles do not have a radome. They will ice up and be worthless. Again, I > would much rather have an integrated panel. > > Their choice to do dual-slant.. we'll see how that goes. Makes all > existing antennas obsolete. I'm a little disappointed since it'll be 10x as > hard to convert a 4x90 FSK site. > > The -6dB 65 degree sectors drive me nuts. There's 26MHz to play with and > you can count on the top being trashed, then cordless phones and baby > monitors all throughout. There's no way in hell we could ever use six > sectors at a site. 90 degree sectors allows you to move around in the band > a little bit. So I hope they come up with some 90's. > > On 10/13/2015 5:24 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote: > > Is the design of the module final? > I'd rather see integrated cables or those pesky RF connectors underneath a > cover to avoid water. > Will Cambium be including RF cables with each SM? > > Also, the specs say 100M throughput in a 20MHz channel. What is the > throughput running in 1x or 2x? > > > 450 + ePMP love child. > > > > >
