Something to do with the synthesizer I believe. 1.25 or 2.5MHz steps or something like that.

On 10/13/2015 5:51 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Curious. I was thinking 4, 8, 12, etc. Or something like that.

20? Really? If you're doing 20, why not just jump the shark and pull a UBNT, and do 26?


bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 10/13/2015 3:49 PM, George Skorup wrote:
5, 7, 10, 20MHz

On 10/13/2015 5:47 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
Any mention of what the channel size options will be in 900 MHz?

bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>

On 10/13/2015 3:42 PM, Brian Sullivan wrote:
Yes.  I'm trying to figure out what to expect, realistically.


On 10/13/2015 5:33 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> What is the throughput running in 1x or 2x
Do you mean 2x, 4x and 6x? Or you really mean single pol or MIMO A operation? Usually you can figure 2x, 4x and 6x are approximately 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 of the 8x throughput. Similarly, 5 and 10 MHz channels have approximately 1/4 and 1/2 the throughput of a 20 MHz channel.
Good enough for government work.
*From:* Brian Sullivan <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 13, 2015 5:24 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP 450i 900 MHz SM
Is the design of the module final?
I'd rather see integrated cables or those pesky RF connectors underneath a cover to avoid water.
Will Cambium be including RF cables with each SM?

Also, the specs say 100M throughput in a 20MHz channel. What is the throughput running in 1x or 2x?


450 + ePMP love child.








Reply via email to