I use sync on my largest tower. 6 titanium (xw) rockets all using 30 MHz channels in the higher 5GHz bands. They are all on only 2 different channels. I've had no issues so far. Been this way for 8 months now. But maybe people just aren't complaining?
Thank you, Brett A Mansfield > On Oct 17, 2015, at 8:29 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have you used sync on any airmax radios? from everything I've read and my own > experience, it's pretty useless. Airfiber's sync on the other hand, works > perfectly... but that's different. > >> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >> They did put a GPS in the new Rocket, so it seems promising... they must >> still be trying, anyway. >> >>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >> >>> I think they have a surprise in the works.... >>> >>> Jaime Solorza >>> >>>> On Oct 17, 2015 8:03 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I didn't say grey were right, just what I thought they were thinking. >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 8:58 PM Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> If my memory serves me correctly, I believe Robert Pera has stated that >>>>> wireless has peaked and they needed to look at other product lines. I’m >>>>> not sure how that could be when WISPS barely cover 10%, if that, of the >>>>> available Internet customers. As Ubiquiti opened up markets that >>>>> Motorola ignored for years, I believe other new markets are going to be >>>>> opening up very soon. I’m betting on it. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lewis Bergman >>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:02 PM >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Maybe they just aren't as bright as everyone is giving them credit. >>>>> Except for Chuck of course. It seems to me they believe wireless is near >>>>> dead so it isn't worth it. Solar being the future and all. Really I think >>>>> it is a case of shiny object syndrome. UBNT always seems to have lacked >>>>> some focus, or at least perseverance. Not to bash then to much. They >>>>> defiant have a value product. >>>>> >>>>> I think they are hurting as the price of what I would term as better >>>>> products have closed the price gap a good bit. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 7:27 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That's what my guess would be too, but the airMax protocol was supposedly >>>>> completely rewritten for the AC radios... you would think they would've >>>>> designed it with sync in mind this time. >>>>> >>>>> If other companies can make sync work with atheros chipsets, I have to >>>>> assume Ubiquiti could too... if they really wanted to. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Many here seem to assume the problem is too difficult for Ubiquiti >>>>> engineers to figure out. Maybe. But if I had to guess, my money would >>>>> be on they boxed themselves in by developing the hardware and the airMax >>>>> protocol first, and then couldn’t get GPS sync to work without starting >>>>> over. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: Josh Luthman >>>>> >>>>> Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:04 PM >>>>> >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Basically a sync capable hardware. >>>>> >>>>> Phy being physical. Layer 1. >>>>> >>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 17, 2015 6:41 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I'm probably the only one that doesn't know this but what is a >>>>> "proprietary 802.11 PHY layer"? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Jeff Broadwick >>>>> >>>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> 312-205-2519 Office >>>>> >>>>> 574-220-7826 Cell >>>>> >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> proprietary 802.11 PHY layer >>>>> >
