Have you used sync on any airmax radios? from everything I've read and my own experience, it's pretty useless. Airfiber's sync on the other hand, works perfectly... but that's different.
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > They did put a GPS in the new Rocket, so it seems promising... they must > still be trying, anyway. > > On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I think they have a surprise in the works.... >> >> Jaime Solorza >> On Oct 17, 2015 8:03 PM, "Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I didn't say grey were right, just what I thought they were thinking. >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 8:58 PM Rory Conaway <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> If my memory serves me correctly, I believe Robert Pera has stated that >>>> wireless has peaked and they needed to look at other product lines. I’m >>>> not sure how that could be when WISPS barely cover 10%, if that, of the >>>> available Internet customers. As Ubiquiti opened up markets that Motorola >>>> ignored for years, I believe other new markets are going to be opening up >>>> very soon. I’m betting on it. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Rory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Lewis Bergman >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:02 PM >>>> >>>> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Maybe they just aren't as bright as everyone is giving them credit. >>>> Except for Chuck of course. It seems to me they believe wireless is near >>>> dead so it isn't worth it. Solar being the future and all. Really I think >>>> it is a case of shiny object syndrome. UBNT always seems to have lacked >>>> some focus, or at least perseverance. Not to bash then to much. They >>>> defiant have a value product. >>>> >>>> I think they are hurting as the price of what I would term as better >>>> products have closed the price gap a good bit. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015, 7:27 PM Mathew Howard <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> That's what my guess would be too, but the airMax protocol was >>>> supposedly completely rewritten for the AC radios... you would think they >>>> would've designed it with sync in mind this time. >>>> >>>> If other companies can make sync work with atheros chipsets, I have to >>>> assume Ubiquiti could too... if they really wanted to. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Many here seem to assume the problem is too difficult for Ubiquiti >>>> engineers to figure out. Maybe. But if I had to guess, my money would be >>>> on they boxed themselves in by developing the hardware and the airMax >>>> protocol first, and then couldn’t get GPS sync to work without starting >>>> over. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>> >>>> *Sent:* Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:04 PM >>>> >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Interesting antenna from UBNT >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Basically a sync capable hardware. >>>> >>>> Phy being physical. Layer 1. >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Oct 17, 2015 6:41 PM, "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I'm probably the only one that doesn't know this but what is a >>>> "proprietary 802.11 PHY layer"? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Jeff Broadwick >>>> >>>> ConVergence Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> 312-205-2519 Office >>>> >>>> 574-220-7826 Cell >>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> On Oct 17, 2015, at 6:22 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> proprietary 802.11 PHY layer >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >
