So are you getting significantly better modulation on sustained level? Tushar
> On Oct 25, 2015, at 10:50 AM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > > We have telrad lte on a few towers, and we did a side by side comparison with > telrad and canopy. > > Cambium 450 3.65ghz can go thru a tree or two at close range (less than 1 > mile). But it only modulates at 1x mimo-a > > Telrad lte is able to blast thru a thicket of trees no problem. > > We've been decommissioning our 450 3.65ghz and replacing with telrad. > > 2cents > > -Sean > > >> On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sean, >> >> You have the Compact wimax right? I'm curious how you'd rate that side by >> side with the PMP450 in 3.65. >> >> Cambium sales said the Compact would give you better NLOS, but where the 450 >> connected it would be faster. Would you say that was accurate? >> >> Thanks, >> Adam >> >> >> >> >>> Nothing really. We tried a few and found either a bare SM or SM+dish was >>> the best solution. Everything else was a PITA because the pig tails that >>> come with the SM are too short, so you either need to do surgery and >>> replace the cables or put the SM in an odd location/orientation to get it >>> connected (if you can find one) >>> >>> 2cents >>> >>> -Sean >>> >>> >>>> On Sunday, October 25, 2015, Paul McCall <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> What has been found as a successful option for attaching to the >>>> connectorized 3.65 SMs? >>>> >>>> Paul, PDMNet
