As far as I can tell, the only difference with sites registered after the
April deadline is that they don't get a protected zone - but they do still
get to operate under the old rules until 2020, they just won't get any
protection from other radios operating under the new rules.

There will be no PAL's in the current 50mhz, it will be GAA only.

Basically, anything you put up now should be good for the next five years,
but after that point it's either going to need to be updated to work with
the SAS thingy, or be replaced with something else. It's pretty safe to
assume that decent radios like PMP/PTP450 and airfiber3x will get updated
to work under the new rules, but I wouldn't expect things like airmax M365
radios to be (legally) usable after 2020.

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:

> If I recall correctly and if my understanding isn't completely flawed then
> it's like this:
>
> If you registered your transmitter before the cutoff date last April then
> you'll have a protected zone where you can continue to operate under the
> old rules until 2020.
>
> For the moment, you can continue registering sites and operate legally as
> you have been doing, but those sites registered after last April's cutoff
> won't get the aforementioned protection....i.e. they will have to abide by
> the new rules whenever the new rules take effect.
>
> The spectrum access database doesn't exist yet as far as I know.  I hadn't
> heard any timeline more specific than "in a year or two", and I don't think
> they can implement the rest of the changes until that exists.  Does anyone
> know who exactly is making that system and what their progress has been
> like?
>
> I also don't know the details of when PAL's are being sold or specifically
> how you get them.
>
>
>
>
> On 11/3/2015 11:12 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote:
>
> Where do we stand on the new 100mhz and the existing 50?
>
> Im working with a third party IT firm that handles IT for the owners of
> three towers we colocate. They have a 3.65 license and are looking at this
> for a backhaul solution. One of the three towers is in a big player are who
> is rolling out 3ghz 450.
>
> Its a slick idea for customer locking to have their interconnection tied
> to a license you own, break contract and your data link goes down because
> you cant operate it.
>
> This is a very friendly communication, the guy has actually tried to hire
> me and we are colocated at other sites that they handle the IT for. My
> biggest concern is that the IT folks will deploy something now that could
> have a cease order in the near future.
>
> Is my understanding correct in that the current 50 will not be a part of
> the three tiers? Thats doable to some degree (fucks us for PMP, but
> landlords are landlords, we could pulll a lease fight, which we would win,
> but it would be followed with the implementation of the 2 year eviction
> notice, not really a win)
>
>
>
> Out of curiosity, from the perspective of the FCC, how does this work out
> when a license holder is using 3ghz to do ptp for a private network?
>
> --
> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team
> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
>
>
>

Reply via email to