What about modifying equipment on an existing registered site? On Tuesday, November 3, 2015, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote:
> If I recall correctly and if my understanding isn't completely flawed then > it's like this: > > If you registered your transmitter before the cutoff date last April then > you'll have a protected zone where you can continue to operate under the > old rules until 2020. > > For the moment, you can continue registering sites and operate legally as > you have been doing, but those sites registered after last April's cutoff > won't get the aforementioned protection....i.e. they will have to abide by > the new rules whenever the new rules take effect. > > The spectrum access database doesn't exist yet as far as I know. I hadn't > heard any timeline more specific than "in a year or two", and I don't think > they can implement the rest of the changes until that exists. Does anyone > know who exactly is making that system and what their progress has been > like? > > I also don't know the details of when PAL's are being sold or specifically > how you get them. > > > > On 11/3/2015 11:12 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > Where do we stand on the new 100mhz and the existing 50? > > Im working with a third party IT firm that handles IT for the owners of > three towers we colocate. They have a 3.65 license and are looking at this > for a backhaul solution. One of the three towers is in a big player are who > is rolling out 3ghz 450. > > Its a slick idea for customer locking to have their interconnection tied > to a license you own, break contract and your data link goes down because > you cant operate it. > > This is a very friendly communication, the guy has actually tried to hire > me and we are colocated at other sites that they handle the IT for. My > biggest concern is that the IT folks will deploy something now that could > have a cease order in the near future. > > Is my understanding correct in that the current 50 will not be a part of > the three tiers? Thats doable to some degree (fucks us for PMP, but > landlords are landlords, we could pulll a lease fight, which we would win, > but it would be followed with the implementation of the 2 year eviction > notice, not really a win) > > > > Out of curiosity, from the perspective of the FCC, how does this work out > when a license holder is using 3ghz to do ptp for a private network? > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > >
