well.... i think we're gonna have an issue. 10.11.160.0 is the local, everything else 10.x.x.x is at the other end.
Not sure how to address that with the nat rule. Almost need to have a 172.x to provide some separation ________________________________ From: Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Vlad Sedov <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 4, 2015 4:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik to Cisco VPN This happens via the IPSec policy, as long as source and destination match. Don't forget the srcnat accept rule from local net to remote, and place it above all other nat rules. Vlad On 11/4/2015 4:46 PM, Tyler Treat wrote: Following up on this -� Got the tunnel up, but in the Tik, where do I point my local subnet to send the traffic across the tunnel? for example is 10.x.x.x is across the tunnel, where do i tell the Tik to send that traffic. ________________________________ From: Af <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> on behalf of Josh Luthman <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 8:57 AM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik to Cisco VPN � Read the wiki page on it to get the values all married up. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Oct 30, 2015 9:47 AM, "Tyler Treat" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Any gotchas when doing a Tik to Cisco ASA VPN? Known issues? ___________________________ Mangled by my iPhone. ___________________________ Tyler Treat Corn Belt Technologies, Inc. [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ___________________________
