So you have 10/8 on one end and 10.11.160/24 on the other? Yeah that
could get messy..
Vlad
On 11/4/2015 5:11 PM, Tyler Treat wrote:
well.... i think we're gonna have an issue.
10.11.160.0 is the local, everything else 10.x.x.x is at the other end.
Not sure how to address that with the nat rule.
Almost need to have a 172.x to provide some separation
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Vlad Sedov
<[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 4, 2015 4:50 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Tik to Cisco VPN
This happens via the IPSec policy, as long as source and destination
match. Don't forget the srcnat accept rule from local net to remote,
and place it above all other nat rules.
Vlad
On 11/4/2015 4:46 PM, Tyler Treat wrote:
Following up on this -�
Got the tunnel up, but in the Tik, where do I point my local subnet
to send the traffic across the tunnel?
for example is 10.x.x.x is across the tunnel, where do i tell the Tik
to send that traffic.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From:* Af <[email protected]> on behalf of Josh Luthman
<[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, October 30, 2015 8:57 AM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Tik to Cisco VPN
�
Read the wiki page on it to get the values all married up.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Oct 30, 2015 9:47 AM, "Tyler Treat" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Any gotchas when doing a Tik to Cisco ASA VPN?
Known issues?
___________________________
Mangled by my iPhone.
___________________________
Tyler Treat
Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
___________________________
