That's OK. But I would bias the output based on the DL/UL percentage,
such that the total of the two comes to 100% instead of 200%.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/7/2015 12:46 PM, George Skorup wrote:
It doesn't matter what DL% you have configured. The frame utilization
gauges are independent and measures their portion of the frame.
On 11/7/2015 2:34 PM, Bill Prince wrote:
But if you're dividing download/upload at 75% (for example), then
50% of 75% D/L is ~~ 37.5% of the total. AND if you're using 50% of
25% U/L, then you're using 12.5% of the total.
Graphs showing percentages of "something" should never show over 100%.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/6/2015 12:57 PM, Josh Baird wrote:
It looks like his graph is stacked.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Bill Prince <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
I don't understand the Y scale on your frame utilization. Is
that percent, or what? And how can you get 150% frame utilization?
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 11/6/2015 9:50 AM, Eric Muehleisen wrote:
We have a few 450 AP's with 30-40 subscribers and have been
getting
several slow speed complaints lately. I just chaulked it up
to issues
with the SM since the AP rarely got over 20mb/s downlink. We
upgraded
to 13.4 recently so we could watch our frame utilization. We
started
graphing it over night and as you can see, we are hitting
100% for
sustained periods of time. During that time the AP is only doing
approx. 23mb/s. This particular AP has 34 registered SM and the
majority show 6x and 4x with 4 or 5 SM's at 2x and 1x. The
performance
is a major disappointment. Anyone else have similar experiences?
AP configuration: 20mhz channels, 2.5ms frame, 10 miles, 75%
downlink,
3 contention slots.
Attached is a screenshot of the utilization and sector
throughput
calculator from the Capacity Planner R13.
