The can be significant performance gains in both memory reduction and IO by using OpenVZ though. It just depends on your needs and environment.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Eric Kuhnke <[email protected]> wrote: > Openvz is really more like a chroot jail. You can accomplish much better > functionality and the ability to run a wider range of guest VMs with xen or > kvm. > > Keep in mind with openvz all guest OS must run the same kernel as the host. > > Unless you need openvz for a hosting environment that will have hundreds of > small VMs on a server with 128GB RAM? > > On Nov 11, 2015 3:58 PM, "Matt" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Anyone out there using Proxmox for virtualization? Have been using if >> for few years running Centos Openvz containers. Like fact that Openvz >> is light weight and gives very little performance penalty. In Proxmox >> 4.x they have introduced the ZFS file system which I think is a great >> offering many features such as mirroring etc. They have also switched >> from Openvz to LXC for containers. Anyone used LXC much? Is it >> stable? Pros and cons vs Openvz?
