Is TA5000 lacking so much? Is calix that much better?
Can somebody tell us what features Adran is lacking? We are going to decide soon on the FTTH vendor. Tushar > On Nov 26, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > > Adtran channel banks are just fine. But their FTTH stuff leaves plenty to be > desired. TA5000 is an E7 wanna be. > > From: Paul Stewart > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 11:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System > > Exactly …. Adtran’s marketing on some of their products and what their “real > world experience” is doesn’t like up. Having said that, the TA5000 system > has promise and I’ve seen a number of ILEC’s deploying it (and CLEC’s). > Calix’s big issue is they have their head up their $$s on a lot of stuff – > once you waive 6 figures in front of them they seem to wake up …. Adtran on > the other hand will spend as much time as needed even over a $1k deal > > From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:40 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System > > Just wish their products were as good as Calex et al. > > From: Lewis Bergman > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 10:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System > > I think Adtran is likely the best company in tech when comparing product and > support. I wish I could claim I had as good a support team as they have. > Amazing. > > > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, 11:22 AM Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/25/15 7:27 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote: > > I assume if they are using IP in the backbone, they aren’t doing it the > > same way we do VoIP on the last mile, which is very inefficient, and > > introduces a lot of latency. > > > I supervised a CLEC delivery of SIP trunks yesterday - over a T1 (as > EFM) using an Adtran 814. > > ~Seth
