Calix is better when you compare E7 with the TA5000.
But only for features you may never need like POTS from the ONT.  

TA5000 is much cheaper.  It really is not lacking much but we have to keep POTS 
running and the E7 along with the Calix ONTs really help with that.  

From: Tushar Patel 
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 1:49 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

Is TA5000 lacking so much?

Is calix that much better?

Can somebody tell us what features Adran is lacking?  

We are going to decide soon on the FTTH vendor.

Tushar 


On Nov 26, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote:


  Adtran channel banks are just fine.  But their FTTH stuff leaves plenty to be 
desired.  TA5000 is  an E7 wanna be.  

  From: Paul Stewart 
  Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 11:04 AM
  To: [email protected] 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

  Exactly …. Adtran’s marketing on some of their products and what their “real 
world experience” is doesn’t like up.  Having said that, the TA5000 system has 
promise and I’ve seen a number of ILEC’s deploying it (and CLEC’s).  Calix’s 
big issue is they have their head up their $$s on a lot of stuff – once you 
waive 6 figures in front of them they seem to wake up …. Adtran on the other 
hand will spend as much time as needed even over a $1k deal 

   

  From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown
  Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 12:40 PM
  To: [email protected]
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

   

  Just wish their products were as good as Calex et al.  

   

  From: Lewis Bergman 

  Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 10:35 AM

  To: [email protected] 

  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Phone System

   

  I think Adtran is likely the best company in tech when comparing product and 
support. I wish I could claim I had as good a support team as they have. 
Amazing.

   

  On Thu, Nov 26, 2015, 11:22 AM Seth Mattinen <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 11/25/15 7:27 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
    > I assume if they are using IP in the backbone, they aren’t doing it the
    > same way we do VoIP on the last mile, which is very inefficient, and
    > introduces a lot of latency.


    I supervised a CLEC delivery of SIP trunks yesterday - over a T1 (as
    EFM) using an Adtran 814.

    ~Seth

Reply via email to