Sorry but your 450 radios cost way too much to do 5.1. ePMP does the entire band and the CPEs aren't $600. And as we found out yesterday the POEs aren't $100. I can install 5 people with the same hardware costs that a single 450 would cost me. 5x revenue and growth for me and my customers.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:42 PM, Matt Mangriotis < [email protected]> wrote: > Sri’s message must have been cut off… the rest of it said, “…and in the > meantime, please buy more PMP 450!” > > > > Matt > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Sriram Chaturvedi > *Sent:* Friday, December 04, 2015 12:36 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Force 110 > > > > Hi Steve, > > > > We have been prioritizing radio performance over the GUI for a very long > time. But, like Josh indicated, we made some incremental improvements in > GUI performance in 2.4 and 2.5 releases but we are fully aware its not > enough. The team has been working on a wholesale rework of the GUI engine > (not as much as the look and feel) and we hope to have significant GUI > performance gains in a Q1 release. We want to make sure it works on a PC, > netbook, mobile etc. with all kinds of processor and memory configurations. > We have been receiving tremendous feedback on use cases and performance > pains seen my many folks on here and we’re taking all this input and > working through them carefully. So keep the feedback (as negative as they > can be) coming, on the GUI performance. > > > > All I can ask at this time is your patience and support. > > > > Thanks, > > Sriram > > > > Join the Conversation > Cambium Networks Community Forum <http://community.cambiumnetworks.com> > > > > > > > > On Dec 4, 2015, at 12:25 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > It does seem slightly better in 2.5.1 than what it did in 2.3, but there > is a good bit of room for speed improvements. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:22 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > I can deal with the GUI being stupid and slow because the performance is > better than UBNT > > On 12/4/2015 12:11 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > the biggest complaint i have is that rather than just loading the > components on the page you are on, it loads the entire webserver and only > displays the components of that page, very inefficient > > > > Im lazy too, I like a site survey option, it makes life easier for techs > to not have to know every possible essid > > > > fsk and 450 make me happy > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > > What are your problems? > > > > On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 1:06 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected]> wrote: > > I wish a GUI glitch was the worst of my problems. > > On 12/4/2015 12:57 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: > > The more We are using EPMP the more i wish the radios had a face so i > could punch it in the face > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:35 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yes. You cannot have single quotes in the device name. I tried that once > and the radio acted really stupid. None of the config would display. For > example, I changed it from "Bob's House" to "Bobs House" and it was sane > again. > > Almost the same thing on Canopy, just a little bit smarter about it. It > won't even let you put a ' in the SNMP site name field. It just reverts > back to the No Site Name default. > > On 12/3/2015 7:29 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > I think it was related to a single quote ' in some of the fields of the > config. I dumped the config, edited them out and now it seems to be fine. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> > <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Thursday, December 3, 2015 6:44:54 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Force 110 > > Never had a problem, but keep in mind I use one PC to update from shipped > firmware to latest and then slap on a template. > > > > Then I use the laptop in the truck to do everything else on site. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I saw something like that happen, but it went back to normal after I > reloaded the interface... or maybe I had to reboot it, I don't remember for > sure. > > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 6:31 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Have any of you seen where most of a Force 110's setting fields are blank > when you login and when you go to save it after entering everything, it > wants to reboot to the 192.168.0.2 address? That's clearly not what I have > entered, but that's what it wants to use. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. > > > > > > >
