haha stefan, get to work I hate regulation, but ATPC should be a fucking mandatory requirement for any get to be approved, even if douchebags dont use it, it should be there
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Daniel Gerlach <[email protected]> wrote: > Stefan, du sollst arbeiten und nicht chatten :) > > 2015-12-10 11:54 GMT+01:00 Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]>: > > It is a shame most 5GHz guys are not able/willing to implement ATPC as > the > > ePMP does. > > > > Seems regulations do not do their jobs in most countries. If they did no > one > > could > > > > sell this radios any longer and vendors are forced to implement it. > > > > > > > > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Eric Kuhnke > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 11:34 > > An: [email protected] > > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] To strong of a signal? > > > > > > > > Ask the manufacturer. There are a lot of licensed band radios that do not > > like an Rx level stronger than about -34 or -35. > > > > With an AF5 you should be thinking about -45 as a good signal. Mid 30s is > > too strong. You're just being a 5 GHz polluter. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, John Babineaux > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What would be a signal that is to strong? > > -30 for a backhaul. If I have a backhaul at what point should I start > > turning down the power or should I do it just because? > > I have an Air Fiber 5 link and it's in the -30s > > > > ____________________________________ > > John Babineaux > > System Administrator > > REACH4 Communications | Website: www.REACH4Com.com > > Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: [email protected] > > 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 > > > > > > > > > > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
