It should... but this is the FCC we're talking about, they wouldn't want to have a rule that was actually good for everyone (other than the manufacturers, I suppose).
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < [email protected]> wrote: > haha stefan, get to work > > I hate regulation, but ATPC should be a fucking mandatory requirement for > any get to be approved, even if douchebags dont use it, it should be there > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Daniel Gerlach <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Stefan, du sollst arbeiten und nicht chatten :) >> >> 2015-12-10 11:54 GMT+01:00 Stefan Englhardt <[email protected]>: >> > It is a shame most 5GHz guys are not able/willing to implement ATPC as >> the >> > ePMP does. >> > >> > Seems regulations do not do their jobs in most countries. If they did >> no one >> > could >> > >> > sell this radios any longer and vendors are forced to implement it. >> > >> > >> > >> > Von: Af [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Eric Kuhnke >> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015 11:34 >> > An: [email protected] >> > Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] To strong of a signal? >> > >> > >> > >> > Ask the manufacturer. There are a lot of licensed band radios that do >> not >> > like an Rx level stronger than about -34 or -35. >> > >> > With an AF5 you should be thinking about -45 as a good signal. Mid 30s >> is >> > too strong. You're just being a 5 GHz polluter. >> > >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Dec 9, 2015 at 11:32 AM, John Babineaux >> > <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > What would be a signal that is to strong? >> > -30 for a backhaul. If I have a backhaul at what point should I start >> > turning down the power or should I do it just because? >> > I have an Air Fiber 5 link and it's in the -30s >> > >> > ____________________________________ >> > John Babineaux >> > System Administrator >> > REACH4 Communications | Website: www.REACH4Com.com >> > Phone: 337-783-3436 x105 | Email: [email protected] >> > 927 N Parkerson Ave, Crowley, LA 70526 >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team > as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >
