The boards that ran Nahum and such I think were technically P6 boards… before they called them that. I know later firmware would identify them as P7 boards
Thank you, Daniel White <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] Cell: +1 (303) 746-3590 Skype: danieldwhite Social: <http://www.linkedin.com/in/danielwhite84> LinkedIn: <https://twitter.com/DanielWhite84> Twitter From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bill Prince Sent: Saturday, December 12, 2015 9:03 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization And if there was a P7, there surely must have been P6, P5, P4, P3, P2, and P1... bp <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com> On 12/11/2015 8:10 PM, George Skorup wrote: I think the first set of radios we bought were P8 5700BHs running v3.something in early 2003. Obviously there was P7 before that. Maybe late '02? And I believe Charles Wu put up those P8s, BTW. :) Pretty sure I still have those stashed in the cabinet, too. On 12/11/2015 9:58 PM, Adam Moffett wrote: When did Canopy hit the shelves? 2003? Is there a PMP product out there with a longer lifespan? Even with better options on the market I know some WISPs have no plans to drop it completely because you still can't beat it for long range reliability. Right. And Neptune was the end of the road for the Voyager probes. From: George Skorup <mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 9:17 PM To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization No, FSK did not get frame utilization in 13.4. I believe Matt or Aaron said the hardware won't support it. And 13.4.1 is the end of the road for PMP100. On 12/11/2015 8:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote: Does this new OID feature work on old PMP100 serires? On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, George Skorup <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: It was there in 2.4.something and my graphs broke after going to 2.5 and 2.5.1. Not sure about 2.5.2 yet. I thought they moved some OIDs back around that got changed for some reason. And it is/was also raw values, not percents yet, AFAIK. On 12/11/2015 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: Not yet but soon (TM) Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Adam Moffett <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Is there a similar OID for the ePMP? On 12/11/2015 2:42 PM, Steve Utick wrote: Frame Utilization downlink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0 Frame Utilization uplink: .1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0 We are graphing it here, requires 14.1.x software before the data is there though. Works great, quick way to tell how full your A/P's are, that's for sure. REALLY turns up the effect of crappy installs. On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Matt <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: If I recall there is a way to graph on 450 the total airtime utilization? What is the SNMP string to do that? Anyone doing it and if so how well does it work? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
