Oh. Right. Back in 95 or there about, Windows NT came out as an
alternative to the old 16-bit Windows.
There were various iterations of both the 16-bit Windows, and a few
iterations of what was then 32-bit Windows. I think Windows ME was the
last iteration of the 16-bit version.
Windows Vista came in 32-bit and 64-bit versions.; both of which are
forks of what was originally Windows NT.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/12/2015 11:39 AM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
It didn't go sequentially like that, win2000 was a direct descendent
of NT4. If I remember right the kernel versions for everything in the
first release of XP are directly one number higher than 2000.
ME was an evolved version of 98SE and a dead end.
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Well, if you want to be picky, 4 (NT) was 4, and 2000 was 5 and ME
was... an abomination that should've never existed.
But who says you have to start at 1 anyway?
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Bill Prince <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
4 was 98; 5 was ME, 6 was Vista.
But that's software. We're talking hardware versions.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/12/2015 8:09 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
But not 4, 5, 6...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Dec 12, 2015 11:07 AM, "Bill Prince" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
But there was a Windows 1 and 2.
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/12/2015 8:04 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
There wasn't a Windows 94, 93, 92, etc...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Bill Prince
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
And if there was a P7, there surely must have been
P6, P5, P4, P3, P2, and P1...
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 12/11/2015 8:10 PM, George Skorup wrote:
I think the first set of radios we bought were P8
5700BHs running v3.something in early 2003.
Obviously there was P7 before that. Maybe late '02?
And I believe Charles Wu put up those P8s, BTW. :)
Pretty sure I still have those stashed in the
cabinet, too.
On 12/11/2015 9:58 PM, Adam Moffett wrote:
When did Canopy hit the shelves? 2003? Is there a
PMP product out there with a longer lifespan? Even
with better options on the market I know some
WISPs have no plans to drop it completely because
you still can't beat it for long range reliability.
Right. And Neptune was the end of the road for
the Voyager probes.
*From:* George Skorup <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Friday, December 11, 2015 9:17 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Graph 450 Airtime Utilization
No, FSK did not get frame utilization in 13.4. I
believe Matt or Aaron said the hardware won't
support it. And 13.4.1 is the end of the road for
PMP100.
On 12/11/2015 8:32 PM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Does this new OID feature work on old PMP100
serires?
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:55 PM, George Skorup
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
It was there in 2.4.something and my graphs
broke after going to 2.5 and 2.5.1. Not sure
about 2.5.2 yet. I thought they moved some
OIDs back around that got changed for some
reason.
And it is/was also raw values, not percents
yet, AFAIK.
On 12/11/2015 1:52 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Not yet but soon (TM)
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Adam
Moffett <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Is there a similar OID for the ePMP?
On 12/11/2015 2:42 PM, Steve Utick wrote:
Frame Utilization downlink:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.1.0
Frame Utilization uplink:
.1.3.6.1.4.1.161.19.3.1.12.1.2.0
We are graphing it here, requires
14.1.x software before the data is
there though. Works great, quick way
to tell how full your A/P's are,
that's for sure. REALLY turns up the
effect of crappy installs.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Matt
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
If I recall there is a way to
graph on 450 the total airtime
utilization? What is the SNMP
string to do that? Anyone doing it and
if so how well does it work?
