so having the servername of the mailhost is redundant as an additional allowed mx, since its already the mx for the domain?
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: > No - it's "allowing" the MX of the current domain to send mail. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:13 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >> v=spf1 a mx mx:server name.com ip4:x.x.x.x ip4:y.y.y.y all >> >> This is the record, Its autogenerated in bind9 as an spf type, previously >> we used txt type with the spf flag. when i run it through mxtoolbox it >> shows a blank mx and the mail host >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> we have an issue with a closed account still spamming, its not a local >>> deal or using our email servers, just altered from >>> >>> Looking at my spf, there is a blank mx in it, is this effectively >>> allowing all mail servers? >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
