I think it turns out to be the all not being ~all On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm not really following, but you may want to read this: > > http://www.openspf.org/SPF_Record_Syntax#mx > > If you have two MX records in this zone: > > IN MX 10 mx1.mydomain.com > IN MX 20 mx2.mydomain.com > > And you have an SPF record that contains this: > > v=spf1 a mx mx:anotherdomain.com > > Then, all 'A' records of the current zone/domain are tested, the 'MX' > record of the current zone/domain is tested, and the 'MX' record for > anotherdomain.com is also tested. > > Josh > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:22 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> though the mx is defined mx1 and mx2 to the mailhost, the spf just has >> the mailhost domain, which has alot of mx records since its a hosting >> platform >> >> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:21 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> so having the servername of the mailhost is redundant as an additional >>> allowed mx, since its already the mx for the domain? >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Josh Baird <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> No - it's "allowing" the MX of the current domain to send mail. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 10:13 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> v=spf1 a mx mx:server name.com ip4:x.x.x.x ip4:y.y.y.y all >>>>> >>>>> This is the record, Its autogenerated in bind9 as an spf type, >>>>> previously we used txt type with the spf flag. when i run it through >>>>> mxtoolbox it shows a blank mx and the mail host >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:08 AM, That One Guy /sarcasm < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> we have an issue with a closed account still spamming, its not a >>>>>> local deal or using our email servers, just altered from >>>>>> >>>>>> Looking at my spf, there is a blank mx in it, is this effectively >>>>>> allowing all mail servers? >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your >>>>> team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >>> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> > > -- If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.
