We have several that we put in service with the new rule. None of the new stuff 
we have received is working 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Yes, you do need unlock key.  Will forward to support team and have them 
> advise latest SW with this in.
> 
>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Jaime Solorza <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> what firmware version and do we need keys?  Thanks
>> 
>> Jaime Solorza
>> Wireless Systems Architect
>> 915-861-1390
>> 
>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:23 AM, Ben Moore <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Hi Guys - 
>>> 
>>> The approvals for both lower band and DFS are in.  Same w it AC gear.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> This is just incredible.  They've been screwing around with this for about 
>>>> 8 months.  Ubiquiti seems to be giving the middle finger to the US market. 
>>>>  I am going to have to look at ripping out some APs and PTP links I put up 
>>>> back in April and replacing them with something else.  I don't know how to 
>>>> explain to a customer that I can't order equipment for their service 
>>>> because my vendor has their head up their ass, that just reflects badly on 
>>>> me for using their equipment.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 4:25 AM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] M series NanoBeam/PowerBeam and U-NII-1
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Only the world version supports it.
>>>> 
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 15, 2015, at 11:06 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anybody know if the NBE-M5-19 and PBE-M5-300/400/620 allow 5150-5250 
>>>>> MHz with release firmware now?  And what is the likelihood any product I 
>>>>> bought from a distributor today would support this band out of the box 
>>>>> without requesting a key from Ubiquiti?
>>>>> 
>>>>> You'd think Ubiquiti would have this somewhere, but I can't find it.
> 

Reply via email to