“think sanely about security rant”

I love it.  The world needs more of this.

A lot of security nonsense we hear from self-important experts reminds me of 
the steel door I once saw with an impressive deadbolt but the hinge pins on the 
outside.  Like the people worrying endlessly about man-in-the-middle hackers 
but you can reset their email password with their pet’s name and reset 
everything else once you control their email account.  Social engineering is 
behind most security breaches.  Once you are on the inside, you don’t need to 
be in the middle.  No, you were not hacked, you were stupid and you were 
scammed, but calling that hacking is an insult to hackers.


From: Tyler Treat 
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:32 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik to Tik VPN: best trade off between performanceand 
security



love this. 




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Af <af-boun...@afmug.com> on behalf of Joshaven Mailing Lists 
<lis...@joshaven.com>
Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 11:05 AM
To: af@afmug.com
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Tik to Tik VPN: best trade off between performance and 
security 

PPTP has lower encryption levels then most and uses basic user/pass to encrypt 
and not large keys… however calling it insecure is throwing much more mud on 
the face of PPTP then it deserves.  It is not even remotely close to no 
encryption which isn’t insecure because encryption no more equal to security 
then having a bank account is equal to being rich… the user can receive a key 
logger virus through an encrypted tunnel just as easily as a non-encrypted 
tunnel and even an unencrypted tunnel cannot be interfered with if you cannot 
access the stream of  data in-between the endpoints.

Ultimately I expect that if a someone is going to breech a system then they 
will probably do it regardless of the encryption level of a tunnel.  So… if you 
want to be able to VPN into a router simply then I see no harm in PPTP unless 
you expect a hacker setting in the middle of your tunnel just waiting to bruit 
force decrypt the captured packets… If you are interconnecting two bank 
branches then first off the applications should be responsible for the data 
security but it is still a good idea to use something with the highest level of 
security.

Sometimes PPTP is still a good option, sometimes better encryption is a good 
idea.  However, tunnel encryption is never an excuse to allow data access to 
unauthorized users so the applications accessibility is what should really be 
our concern.

Sorry, I’m on my think sanely about security rant… done now. 


Sincerely,
Joshaven Potter
Google Hangouts: j...@g2wireless.co
Cell & SMS: 1-517-607-9370
supp...@joshaven.com




  On Dec 22, 2015, at 8:43 PM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

  I don't know if ipsec is hardware offloaded on Mikrotik, but if it is it's 
probably your best bet. EoIP does have a performance/overhead hit.. Wasn't 
there something fairly recent about eoip+ipsec? PPTP is NOT security any more 
than WEP is. Most opensource products have removed it at this point - shame on 
MikroTik for not following suit.

  On Dec 22, 2015 7:37 PM, "Mathew Howard" <mhoward...@gmail.com> wrote:

    You apparently can do encryption on EOIP now... I haven't tried it though, 
so I have no idea if it actually works or if it spoils the simplicity part...

    On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
wrote:

      EOIP wouldn't be encrypted...



      Josh Luthman
      Office: 937-552-2340
      Direct: 937-552-2343
      1100 Wayne St
      Suite 1337
      Troy, OH 45373


      On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:57 PM, Tyler Treat 
<tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> wrote:

        If only EOIP.  Damn I love the simplicity.  

        On Dec 22, 2015, at 6:51 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
wrote:


          OVPN probably?  Not sure about IPSec on the CCR.



          Josh Luthman
          Office: 937-552-2340
          Direct: 937-552-2343
          1100 Wayne St
          Suite 1337
          Troy, OH 45373


          On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Tyler Treat 
<tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com> wrote:

            Tunneling between 2 sites, not trying to bridge a single subnet or 
any nonsense like that.  Well connected on either end.

            Which style of tunnel is going to provide the best security vs 
performance value.

            Thinking CCR as a concentrator with 2011's or crs125's at end 
points.

            Feedback appreciated.

            Thanks!
            Tyler

            ___________________________
            Mangled by my iPhone.
            ___________________________
            Tyler Treat
            Corn Belt Technologies, Inc.
            tyler.tr...@cornbelttech.com
            ___________________________





Reply via email to