We have a couple of APs with CE MACs that don't have any customers on them yet, and I noticed that none of those have rebooted... we also have a couple with customers that no problems have shown up on yet... it seems to me that they either aren't all affected, or some are just not as sensitive as others.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Joe Novak <[email protected]> wrote: > I had a customer that could crash his radio on demand by firing up Amazon > prime and watching any video. Netflix would take 10 or so minutes to crash > his radio. Only when he used his Xbox one. You could take all the laptops > in his house and watch a youtube video, and turn on a netflix stream - the > only thing that crashed it was his Xbox One. > > I have both of his CPEs set aside to test this firmware on.. it got very > bad when it got cold. We put up a 110 PTP (AP lite, whatever) that had a CE > mac.. and it has not rebooted yet.. I don't know what to make of it. > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:19 PM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> hmm... I hadn't thought about it before, but we had an SM acting up last >> week... it was a D0 MAC, replaced it with a CD and the problem went away... >> but we did also replace the RJ45s, so who knows. I guess I should do some >> testing on that one. >> >> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:55 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> OK but... I'd think it's more than a coincidence that I'm having strange >>> lockup/reboot issues with these radios since they're 00:04:56:CE+ MACs. And >>> only those radios. These are just regular/non-GPS 5GHz connectorized. And >>> they're the newest ones we've bought. So, I'm gonna go with.. yeah. >>> >>> We swapped the first one a couple weeks ago with a C6 ESN. I could start >>> a MT TCP bandwidth test and it would crash within 5 seconds of starting the >>> upload test. Same cable, RJ45s, injector, etc. and the replacement works >>> fine. When we first discovered the problem, the uptime was several hours >>> and none of the GUI stats would load and it was just acting funny. I was >>> sitting there watching it and the customer would start a Facebook or Google >>> Drive or something upload and it would crash. That's when I started >>> debugging with the MT bandwidth test. >>> >>> This second one is now over an hour away so we're just going to head >>> there with a complete spare 110 kit with a C8 ESN radio. I can't risk >>> loading a beta firmware remotely. >>> >>> On 1/11/2016 4:54 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> >>> That's not the cold memory bug, I don't think. That is some other bug >>> that may be resolved in 2.6, though... >>> >>> >>> Josh Luthman >>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> 1100 Wayne St >>> Suite 1337 >>> Troy, OH 45373 >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 5:52 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Guess we had more than that one. Found another one that we did for a >>>> PTP link between buildings for a customer and it's acting stupid too. CF >>>> ESN. The other side is a C8 and it works fine. Ethernet stops passing >>>> traffic, GUI doesn't display all items, etc. Same thing the other one was >>>> doing. >>>> >>>> On 1/11/2016 3:22 PM, George Skorup wrote: >>>> >>>> Looking through stock, this is the only radio I have with newer than CF >>>> ESNs. I think this was a Force110 kit we picked up from Baltic. I have a >>>> small stash of integrated 5GHz and connectorized radios and they're all <C9 >>>> ESNs. We don't use a whole lot of them, just some PTP and very small POPs. >>>> >>>> On 1/11/2016 3:04 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>> >>>> I think the link is somewhere in this thread... otherwise, ask Sriram >>>> for it. >>>> >>>> I wish we only had one... I've found 16 so far... and I suspect a few >>>> more are still going to show up. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Nate Burke < <[email protected]> >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I would concur with that, I only have 1 AP with 00:04:56:CE, and it >>>>> acted up last night. How does one go about getting this new magic >>>>> firmware? >>>>> >>>>> On 1/11/2016 2:48 PM, George Skorup wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Well, that explains the problem I have with a 00:04:56:CF. Just a >>>>> standard 5GHz connectorized radio used as an SM. It reboots under heavy >>>>> uplink traffic in cold weather. Awesome. Now how many more do I have like >>>>> this. >>>>> >>>>> On 1/11/2016 10:32 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>>> >>>>> That would make sense... all of ours that I've seen it on so far have >>>>> been 00:04:56:CE:XX:XX MACs >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Josh Luthman < >>>>> <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 2.6.1rc1 from Sri. >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe he said the MACs have CE in them (000456 CE????) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Tyson Burris @ Internet >>>>>> Communications Inc < <[email protected]>[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> What firmware you guys running? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Tyson Burris, President* >>>>>>> *Internet Communications Inc.* >>>>>>> *739 Commerce Dr.* >>>>>>> *Franklin, IN 46131* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #* >>>>>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #* >>>>>>> *Online: * <http://www.surfici.net>* >>>>>>> <http://www.surfici.net>www.surfici.net <http://www.surfici.net>* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [image: ICI] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *What can ICI do for you?* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Broadband Wireless - PtP/PtMP Solutions - WiMax - Mesh >>>>>>> Wifi/Hotzones - IP Security - Fiber - Tower - Infrastructure.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is intended for the* >>>>>>> *addressee shown. It contains information that is* >>>>>>> *confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review,* >>>>>>> *dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by* >>>>>>> *unauthorized organizations or individuals is strictly* >>>>>>> *prohibited.* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *From:* Af [mailto: <[email protected]>[email protected]] *On >>>>>>> Behalf Of *Josh Luthman >>>>>>> *Sent:* Monday, January 11, 2016 10:39 AM >>>>>>> *To:* <[email protected]>[email protected] >>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] ePMP in cold weather >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> From what I heard this morning I'm confident. And surprised it can >>>>>>> be fixed in software. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Josh Luthman >>>>>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>>>>> Suite 1337 >>>>>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 11, 2016 10:28 AM, "Vlad Sedov" < <[email protected]> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's promising... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vlad >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/11/2016 9:25 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No... it's not a connector issue. Cambium knows about it and they >>>>>>> have a fix that they're testing. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Vlad Sedov < <[email protected]> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't buy the connector thing, at least not in all cases. I'm >>>>>>> looking at the output of "debug crashlog" on one of the affected radios, >>>>>>> and it does look like it's crashing hard. I don't see how it would be a >>>>>>> connector issue. Also, we have a few sites with zero issues.. Same >>>>>>> firmware >>>>>>> and everything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vlad >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 1/11/2016 9:20 AM, Tyson @ Internet Communications Inc (ICI) >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So is this a cable connector problem? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *Tyson Burris, President Internet Communications Inc. 739 Commerce >>>>>>> Dr. Franklin, IN 46131 * >>>>>>> *317-738-0320 <317-738-0320> Daytime #* >>>>>>> *317-412-1540 <317-412-1540> Cell/Direct #* >>>>>>> *Online: <http://www.surfici.net>www.surfici.net >>>>>>> <http://www.surfici.net>* >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Forgive the brevity, the typos and my fat fingers! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jan 11, 2016, at 10:12 AM, Josh Baird < <[email protected]> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/Cold-Weather-Issues/m-p/36592#U36592> >>>>>>> http://community.cambiumnetworks.com/t5/ePMP-1000/Cold-Weather-Issues/m-p/36592#U36592 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Vlad Sedov < <[email protected]> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hey folks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is anyone having trouble with ePMP (GPS variety) in cold weather? We >>>>>>> seem to have a few units that started randomly locking up in the middle >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> the night when temps are below freezing. Rebooting seems to clear >>>>>>> things up >>>>>>> for a day or so. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> peace >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Vlad >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No virus found in this message. >>>>>>> Checked by AVG - <http://www.avg.com>www.avg.com >>>>>>> Version: 2016.0.7294 / Virus Database: 4489/11377 - Release Date: >>>>>>> 01/11/16 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
