I don't see how they're going to get the density / throughput that they expect, especially for a video play, using fixed wireless. The expectations of someone like a WISP / smaller ISP and AT&T are very different things.
On Tuesday, January 12, 2016, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > Except they are looking to move their set top boxes for uverse over to > this model. > On Jan 12, 2016 10:56 PM, "Jason McKemie" < > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> Verizon did this around here years ago - didn't really fit the business >> model they are used to. Even if they did roll out with a large scale fixed >> deployment they would still have fairly restrictive caps, which makes them >> easy to compete with. >> >> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >>> They are also moving in the direction of fixed wireless. AT&T is testing >>> this now. >>> On Jan 12, 2016 8:20 PM, "Keefe John" <[email protected] >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >>> >>>> when will we see 802.11 ax fixed wireless gear? >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.extremetech.com/computing/184685-what-is-802-11ax-wifi-and-do-you-really-need-a-10gbps-connection-to-your-laptop >>>> >>>> On 1/12/2016 8:05 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>>> >>>> *nods* It'll affect you long before it affects most WISPs. It'll be >>>> urban, then suburban, probably not rural. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- >>>> Mike Hammett >>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>>> http://www.ics-il.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>> >>>> Midwest Internet Exchange >>>> http://www.midwest-ix.com >>>> >>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>> ------------------------------ >>>> *From: *"Peter Kranz" <[email protected]> >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>> *To: *[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>> *Sent: *Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:02:58 PM >>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] T-Mobile Deploying 5 GHz Yet? >>>> >>>> I guess I agree with your assertion that LTE in unlicensed spectrum >>>> will not be on high level cell towers, but you might want to look at this >>>> presentation from one of the cell phone chipset vendors: >>>> https://www.qualcomm.com/documents/making-best-use-unlicensed-spectrum-presentation >>>> >>>> Notice all the places they show LTE in Unlicensed Spectrum being used. >>>> Imagine the effect if thousands of devices deployed in these environments >>>> used the 5Ghz band, especially that supermarket scenario where the sector >>>> is mounted outside the building. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This is how they are going to share the spectrum fairly. Imagine the >>>> fun with these pulsing interference sources. I.e. a jammer for 50ms on and >>>> then off. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *Peter Kranz *www.UnwiredLtd.com <http://www.unwiredltd.com/> >>>> Desk: 510-868-1614 x100 >>>> Mobile: 510-207-0000 >>>> [email protected] >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>
