Very well said … goes back to where I always suggest folks to build 
relationships with Cisco, Juniper, Brocade or whomever – they will tell you 
this stuff and tailor to your requirements.

 

It very well accepted that oversubscribing of cards/ports is common .. some 
usage scenarios permit this to work and others don’t.

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 10:09 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

Not necessarily - one needs to be familiar with the hardware specs on the 
particular Cisco platform one is using. It's possible to 2:1 or 4:1 
oversubscribe the 10GbE ports on each linecard in a 6500/7600 series if you 
configure it a certain way. Legacy 6500 stuff is 8Gbps per slot but you can 
have a 16-port GBIC linecard. Or encounter a setup like a 48-port 1000BaseT 
card that is on a 32Gbps backplane bus. Other things like a 7206VXR with NPE-G1 
and PA-GE modules can do line-rate GbE on the three routing engine GBICs, but 
each PA-GE is more like a 600 Mbps interface. 

Same with Juniper on many platforms. When using a mature platform they're 
usually on the 3rd, 4th or 5th generation of linecards and supervisors that 
mate with a particular chassis and backplane. It's very useful to do some 
research into the technical specs and limitations of the 1st/2nd generations to 
learn how the platform evolved into its current mature state.

 

 

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Erich Kaiser <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

I agree there is a huge price difference between a Mikrotik and a 
Juniper/Cisco/Brocade router, but you also need to look at the facts.  Those 
routers are made to support a Full  routed 10Gbps/40Gbps/100Gbps of throughput 
per port.  With Mikrotik it is a MAYBE it will if I don't do this or do that.. 
Obviously there are many models out there, but if you look at the true carrier 
grade router lines, it is a full routed port.

 

I think each one has its place.  

 

Just my opinion..


 

Erich Kaiser

North Central Tower

[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 

Office: 630-621-4804

Cell: 630-777-9291



 

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

The #1 thing I learned at NANOG was that the big vendors are just as full of 
shit as the little vendors. Cisco, Juniper, AlcaLu, etc. are all just as likely 
to ignore problems and create bugs as Mikrotik, Ubiquiti, etc.

When sitting at a table at about 1 AM one night with a head engineer with one 
international operator and one national operator I said something to the effect 
of, "I've just largely been listening to you guys comparing notes on different 
products and issues you've had. I use Mikrotik routers in my network and people 
often say they are junk and that Cisco, Juniper, etc. are the way to go. Those 
vendors are exactly who you guys use and yet here you are with the same type of 
complaints as we have with our vendors." The one at the international vendor 
chimed in, "and we pay 10x more for that right."

Don't lose sight of that.

For example, Cisco is known for having Ethernet chipset incompatibility 
issues....  which is exactly what this sub-topic has been about.


To think otherwise is simply blind arrogance.



-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com

 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> 

Midwest Internet Exchange
http://www.midwest-ix.com




  _____  


From: "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 10:49:12 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

This is sort of an illustration of why I am still very wary of Mikrotik for 
routers. 

There's a myriad of Cisco routers available with 12 to 20 SFP-based GbE 
interfacess (used/refurb) that are just as capable, if somewhat bigger and 
hotter, that run very stable versions of IOS. It's totally unacceptable for 
Cisco to break basic functionality for $HUGE_ISP and $HUGE_ENTERPRISE_CUSTOMER 
, which are usually using the same IOS trains I use for service provider 
functions. 

Mikrotik OS software support is pretty much "hey go over to this forum and hope 
somebody answers your question", if something is broken you are just supposed 
to wait for a new version release in a month or two. If something is 
fundamentally broken in a version of IOS used by a mature (6+ year old) Cisco 
platform it's almost certain that somebody much bigger and more important than 
yourself has already run into the issue, escalated it with Cisco, and a new 
build fixing the bug is available.

 

If the space and power are available I would much rather have a 6503E with dual 
supervisor than a CCR....

 

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> wrote:

This just gets even better.  Worked 24 hours, then breaks again.  Up to Level 4 
tech support.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 7:56 AM


To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

We are taking it to the Mikrotik forum.  This makes no sense since we have 12 
of the already running with no issues.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2016 7:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

I’m not terribly happy with ROS since 6.29.

 

Maybe it’s just still not 100% yet.

 

 

 

From: Rory Conaway 

Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2016 8:36 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

Replaced the Mikrotik routers with an Airrouter, it works.  Replaced with an 
Edgerouter, still works.  This goes under the category of WTF.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

We tried 3 Mikrotik routers, 2 cable modems, and two radios from two different 
manufacturers.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Glen Waldrop
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 8:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

MTU?

Last time I had that problem was an inconsistent Ethernet connection. It wasn’t 
showing errors, but UDP was dropping packets. TCP retransmitted.

UDP was screwy, but TCP was downloading at the limit of the wireless feed.

 

 

 

 

 

From: Rory Conaway 

Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 9:47 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

Nailed the problem down to the Mikrotik router having a problem with DNS 
caching whether it’s Cox or Google.  Not sure where to go from there since the 
other 12 don’t have a problem.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rory Conaway
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 4:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

We had raons bit no dangling cables.  Level 3 says no errors to the modem and 
we had a tech out already.  We are changing the 2011 to a 450 just to confirm 
before we eacalate further.

 

 

 

Rory Conaway 

Triad Wireless

 

Typed on my phone with one finger so please excuse typos and abbreviations.

 

 

-------- Original message --------

From: That One Guy /sarcasm <[email protected]> 

Date: 1/11/2016 10:38 AM (GMT-07:00) 

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download 

 

If it just started and youre in an area hit by storms, some of the neighbors, 
mostly the empty houses with no tenants at this point, cable was busted down by 
tree limbs and is dangling terminated byt the mud now

 

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Glen Waldrop <[email protected]> wrote:

Likely an RF issue on the cable side.

I see this sort of thing with the company I consult for. They’ll have me going 
through the router, trying to shut down the “virus” or peer to peer when it is 
thousands and thousands of retransmits and broken packets.

 

Just like our wireless it can have good quality until loaded, then watch the 
quality drop to nearly nothing and loose connection.

 

 

 

From: Rory Conaway 

Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 8:25 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

The Netgear router has nothing to do with it, I was just using their website as 
an example of downloading a file.  It’s computer, 2011, cable modem, the world. 
 I just can’t download anything from any sites.  What’s weird is they just drop.

 

Rory

 

From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof
Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 5:12 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

You mention Netgear, is this a Netgear router?  They used to have a problem 
with downloads stalling, but that was quite a few years ago.  The fix was to 
disable SPI Firewall.

 

 

From: Rory Conaway 

Sent: Sunday, January 10, 2016 6:06 PM

To: [email protected] 

Subject: [AFMUG] Weird Problem with download

 

We have a cable circuit that can do everything except download.  There is a 
Mikrotik router between the computer and the cable modem.  Haven’t tested 
taking the router out yet but we have tried 2 routers, same results.  
Basically, downloads either don’t start or start and then just crash.  Game 
machines can’t update, even downloading a 20MB file from netgear fails.  
Everything else seems to work.  Any ideas would be helpful.

 

Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO

4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040

602-426-0542

[email protected]

www.triadwireless.net

 

“Life is full of unfair calls, missed plays, and bad catches.  But true 
baseball players keep on playing”  - Lessons from Baseball

 





 

-- 

If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team as 
part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team.

 

 

 

 <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>  

Reply via email to