OK. I'm stupid...
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/3/2016 9:20 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
On purpose...
*From:* Bill Prince <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Wednesday, February 03, 2016 10:16 AM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee
Dyslexic acronym.
DMCA (Dumb Money Customer Application?)...
bp
<part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
On 2/3/2016 7:09 AM, Chuck McCown wrote:
Hmmm, I think I will start sending out scary extortion emails because
of DCMA violations. Might make a few bucks.
(Dumb Consumers Money Application). I will let them off the hook for
$20 and give them a full release....
*From:* Eric Kuhnke <mailto:[email protected]>
*Sent:* Tuesday, February 02, 2016 5:42 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] DMCA Time Management Fee
Now if we could just get the automated DMCA "pay up or we sue you"
extortion emailers to realize that Canadian ARIN IP blocks are not
subject to the DMCA.
All that crap goes to /dev/null...
On Feb 2, 2016 9:31 AM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What do you thing about charging a fee every time that a customer
gets a DMCA takedown notice. These notices take time to track
down and follow up on. If we charged $20 every time it would
make it not really worth it to pirate that $10 movie. I would
think that it should be legal, so long as we add it to our
customer agreement. Anyone ever thought about this? Right now
we pass on 5 of them and then make them find a new provider. It
seems like they would be less likely to hit 5 if they had to pay
$20 for each one. We really don't want these guys on our network
anyway, so no sweat if they just cancel. Is anyone out there
charging customers a fee for these? I know most of you just
ignore them, but we like passing them on, as it lowers our
overall usage.
