I thought there was licensed spectrum around 3.5 GHz but can’t find anything in 
the FCC band plan, maybe I am remembering wrong, or maybe that is somewhere 
else in the world?  I thought that was part of the appeal of 3650 was there was 
already WiMAX equipment built for licensed 3.5 GHz as well as antennas.

Doing a Google search, I find this article indicating there are longstanding 
3.5 GHz spectrum licenses in Canada:

http://www.itworldcanada.com/article/rural-users-lose-when-spectrum-is-hoarded-experts/47863


From: Philip Rankin 
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 1:41 PM
To: af 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs

Please forgive me for hijacking the thread!!   But, the additional bandwidth is 
not available at 3.65  or 3.5Ghz yet is it???  Nothing beyond the 3.65 - 
3.70Ghz as has been for quite sometime??

On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:22 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> wrote:

  50 mhz block its 3.65 mhz, there is no 50 mhz block in 2.5 ghz... They also 
state Caribbean... so that would mean either USVI or PR if they are sticking 
with FCC/ US markets....

  On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 9:30 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

    You can sign up for “insider news and priority access”:
    http://infinitibroadband.com/


    From: Keefe John 
    Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 6:59 PM
    To: [email protected] 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs

    anyone know what 10 markets they're going to?


    On 2/2/2016 6:51 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:

      I suspect that it's supposed to be 2.5ghz... as far as I know, Huawei 
doesn't make gear for the 3.65ghz band.

      On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Ken Hohhof <[email protected]> wrote:

        That can’t possibly be what they mean by acquiring 50 MHz of licensed 
spectrum in all their markets from a private party, can it?

        Did they also acquire an elevator pass from a high school senior?


        From: Rory Conaway 
        Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2016 6:43 PM
        To: [email protected] 
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs

        It’s all in the marketing and presentation to the investors.



        Rory



        From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Heskett
        Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 5:16 PM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Looks like more companies want to be WISPs



        i think they are touting that they have a nation wide NN license for 
the 3.65-3.7Ghz band (like the rest of us lol).  







        On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Jaime Solorza 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        says 3.5GHz>>.is that correct?




        Jaime Solorza

        Wireless Systems Architect

        915-861-1390



        On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rory Conaway <[email protected]> 
wrote:

        
http://www.telecompetitor.com/infiniti-broadband-to-bring-broadband-wireless-to-10-markets/?



        Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO

        4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040

        602-426-0542

        [email protected]

        www.triadwireless.net



        “When you're in a slump, it's almost as if you look out at the field 
and it's one big glove.” - Vance Law















-- 

Philip J. Rankin 
Wireless Telecommunications Services
PO Box 24
Pittsburg, KS  66762

Reply via email to