I have used it for over a year and love it, the biggest benefit is it gives me a way to historically keep track of people that want service, even if I can't service them, I can always go on the map and see where the potential customers that want service are and I can build to them. I don't even use the signal readings although they are fairly accurate, I always still go out and do site surveys.
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:42 PM, Sean Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > Good data in = good data out! > > I went thru our network and plotted all our APs. I then went thru and > validated already installed clients to see if the signal matched the > model's prediction. If it was more than +\- 3db then I went and changed the > model to match the real world. > > It is now very accurately predicts our network. > > Also if you are trying to get it to predict nLOS or NLOS links I don't > think you will get accurate results...to many unknown variables to > accurately predict. > > -Sean > > On Wednesday, February 3, 2016, Tim Reichhart < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Who on this list is using towercoverage.com? I want to know how accurate >> it is because I have an account now with them and I am doubt its very >> accurate to give out an good signal from my tower. Because I really hate >> spending 25 dollars per month and its not going to be accurate. >> >> Tim >> >> >> >>
