What you basically just said is that WISPs can't lie about their coverage areas despite 50% of the maps of the LECs, cablecos, and larger WISPs being total bullshit.
Is that correct? On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: > If you claim 100% coverage of a census block or tract and that prevents a > telco from getting its welfare check, they will do drive testing of the > whole thing. It has already happened and will happen much more in the > future as the FCC reduces the unsubsidized competitor coverage percentage > that takes away their support. Just sayin, claiming more turf than you > truly serve or can serve in 7-10 days with 10 down and 1 up (soon to change > to 25 down) can bring grief. There is no upside to claiming more than you > can do on a 477 turf wise or speed wise but there is a big downside. > > From: Cameron Crum > Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 8:10 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com? > > I'm not sure even areas as small as census blocks groups allow you to be > surgically accurate. > > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Chuck McCown <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I would say that y’all better be getting surgically accurate on your 477 >> filings. You do sign them under penalty of perjury and there will be telcos >> challenging your coverage data. >> >> From: Dennis Burgess >> Sent: Thursday, February 04, 2016 7:07 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com? >> >> >> We also do the Form 477, i.e. broadband deployment data as well as the >> broadband sub data if your billing system don’t do that anyways. >> >> >> >> The new APIs allow almost limitless integration with other applications. >> I.e. you can do a path profile using our data in about 200ms though the API. >> Just a matter of the billing/powercode/visp/whatever programming it up .. >> >> >> >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. >> >> [email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of David >> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 8:03 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Who is using towercoverage.com? >> >> >> >> +1000 >> for this solution.. Unless you invest the time and effort to build a >> custom solution like towercoverage I dont complain about the number of >> customers it has brought to us and >> the countless times it has saved us on truck rolls for invalid service. >> Also, the EUS data alone is very helpful when determining new site >> locations. >> We have 4 new sites going up this year because of that data. >> U-Verse is our only real competitor in a couple of these areas. If I could >> only sell TV i would have it in the bag :) >> >> >> >> >> On 02/03/2016 11:26 PM, Josh Luthman wrote: >> >> It says it when you log in to towercoverage.com >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Feb 4, 2016 12:19 AM, "CBB - Jay Fuller" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hmmm.....news to me >> >> >> >> Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone >> >> >> >> ----- Reply message ----- >> From: "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]> >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com? >> Date: Wed, Feb 3, 2016 10:22 PM >> >> >> >> Uh you can dude. Been a while since they enabled that. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Feb 3, 2016 11:07 PM, "Jeremy" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> This. So much this. Powercode already has the azimuths, downtilt, gps >> coordinates, and everything. That should really be the next step is pulling >> this info for integration. I have had an active account for like a year and >> have never used it. I just don't have the time to add it all. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 8:29 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> suggestion - take our antenna plots directly from pokeycode, i mean >> powercode, and automatically populate all our towers in towercoverage... :) >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> >> From: Dennis Burgess >> >> To: [email protected] >> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 8:51 PM >> >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com? >> >> >> >> Thanks for all of the kind comments and suggestions. The pricing is the >> same as since its inception, we have a dedicated staff to answer questions >> as well as take phone calls if you need assistance. Feel free to call or >> e-mail. >> >> >> >> >> >> Dennis Burgess, CTO, Link Technologies, Inc. >> >> [email protected] – 314-735-0270 x103 – www.linktechs.net >> >> >> >> From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of That One Guy /sarcasm >> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:31 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] who is using towercoverage.com? >> >> >> >> wow, the pricing is a whole lot more realistic than it used to be, still >> expensive if you wanted to plot every antenna, but omni will get you the >> gist of it. hopefully their support is better than a repetitive canned >> response now >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:27 PM, Josh Luthman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> $25/mo is not much. I strongly recommend signing up for it simply for the >> EUS form. If you get ONE customer out of the purchase, you made money. Any >> more than that is gravy. >> >> >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Tim Reichhart >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Who on this list is using towercoverage.com? I want to know how accurate >> it is because I have an account now with them and I am doubt its very >> accurate to give out an good signal from my tower. Because I really hate >> spending 25 dollars per month and its not going to be accurate. >> >> Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't see your team >> as part of yourself you have already failed as part of the team. >> >> >> >> > >
