There was no such thing as an sfp when the 3550-12 was created. Twelve GBIC. On Feb 5, 2016 12:42 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Gbic or sfp? Two different things. > On Feb 5, 2016 2:26 PM, "Eric Kuhnke" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Remember when a Cisco 3550-48 with EMI software was $3000... Now I get >> them for free, the 3550-12 gbic version for $20. >> On Feb 5, 2016 9:22 AM, "Travis Johnson" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I remember when we bought some of our first Intel 10/100 switches... >>> they were $2,400 each and we bought three of them for our NOC backbone. >>> >>> Travis >>> >>> >>> On 2/5/2016 9:55 AM, Nate Burke wrote: >>> >>>> I have mixed feelings on it, I think that if you're pushing the >>>> envelope, then you should pay for it. But as the market meets demand, >>>> prices should come down. Remember back when 10/100 switches were $1000? >>>> Now, you can get a 24 Port 1G switch with 10G uplinks for, what, $400? In >>>> another 10 years, 100G will probably be the same. Pickup a 24 Port 100G >>>> switch with 1TB uplinks for $200. >>>> >>>> Although at the same time, Throwing more Bandwidth at the problem just >>>> makes for sloppier code. Average webpage loads are now, what 5-6mb, for >>>> really no more content. Things used to be efficient, as it was the >>>> programs responsibility for performance, Now it's the clients >>>> responsibility if things are slow (upgrade your PC, upgrade your internet) >>>> >>>> https://xkcd.com/1605/ >>>> >>>> On 2/5/2016 10:34 AM, Adam Moffett wrote: >>>> >>>>> You tell them and they'll tell you how your capital expenses don't >>>>> matter. >>>>> In 1995 they decided that internet should be free and they'll never >>>>> stop believing it. >>>>> >>>>> On 2/5/2016 10:04 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I cringe when people portray multi gigabit bandwidth as costing >>>>>> pennies, as if the only cost is the fiber. Yeah, until you have to route >>>>>> those packets, rather than just transporting a beam of light. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Faisal Imtiaz >>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2016 8:57 AM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 100Gbps >>>>>> >>>>>> It's not un-common to do 100Gpbs as follows:- >>>>>> Bonding 10x 10G circuits >>>>>> Bonding a combination of 40G circuits. >>>>>> >>>>>> providing 100G switched transport is easy. >>>>>> Having a router, to do 100G transport is not, >>>>>> Expect to pay approx $100k for a router (loaded ready to go, on the >>>>>> 2ndary markets) >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Faisal Imtiaz >>>>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom >>>>>> 7266 SW 48 Street >>>>>> Miami, FL 33155 >>>>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 >>>>>> >>>>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: [email protected] >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- Original Message ----- >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 1:01:09 AM >>>>>>> Subject: [AFMUG] 100Gbps >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> So... Let's just say, for a minute, that I could sell Adobe a 100Gbps >>>>>>> line. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What would that be priced at? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think I can do it technically with a pair of fiber I can get end >>>>>>> to end. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are their LD optics at 100Gbps yet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Or are we still talking dense wave multiplexing? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>
