So it sounds like the big difference on the 320/430 is different power pinout?
Steve From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Forrest Christian (List Account) Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 5:25 PM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Power and Sync for ePMP 1000 AP The 30V rating is more a label for the radios, and NOT for the injector. Any revision H injector should be good up to at least 56V. Above that gets touchy. The Rev I and later injectors (Gigabit only) are fine a bit higher. So just power them at the radio voltage, and don't worry about it unless you're hooking them to a battery array with some insane charging and/or equalization voltage. Also, 28V or so should be fine as well. -forrest On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Wireless Administrator <[email protected]> wrote: I know there was discussion here over the last several weeks about ePMP AP’s developing issues in the cold when powered by 24v Sources like PacketFlux PMP100 SyncInjectors. I recall the recommendation was to move to 48V. Since the PacketFlux PMP100 SyncInjectors are only rated to 30V, Is the recommendation to Power them using a PMP320/430 SyncInjectors? I realize this will not support Gigabit Ethernet. I have a need to support ePMP100 and PMP320 on the same injector. Steve B. -- Forrest Christian CEO, PacketFlux Technologies, Inc. Tel: 406-449-3345 | Address: 3577 Countryside Road, Helena, MT 59602 <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] | <http://www.packetflux.com/> http://www.packetflux.com <http://www.linkedin.com/in/fwchristian> <http://facebook.com/packetflux> <http://twitter.com/@packetflux> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_compose> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce> <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/t/pixel.png?e=setup_page_outlook_active&uid=e965778f9a351fad7a8a860dffc144ce>
