Funny I did the same thing. Best regards, Brandon Yuchasz GogebicRange.net www.gogebicrange.net
-----Original Message----- From: Af [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:54 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] HAMSs and Internet I am disappointed to discover that Google Translate does not understand Morse. How will Murph decode the message from Coop? -----Original Message----- From: Chuck McCown Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 10:42 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] HAMSs and Internet .... .. .... .. -----Original Message----- From: Ken Hohhof Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 9:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] HAMSs and Internet It is all radio-to-radio voice, but they link the repeater nodes together via VoIP, so you can talk to someone on a different node. Similar to digital trunking in a 2-way radio system. I don't believe they link to the PSTN, or to VoIP phones. You do know that ham radio has voice now, right? You don't have to use Morse code. Google "IRLP". -----Original Message----- From: Jay Weekley Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 9:51 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AFMUG] HAMSs and Internet Seems like HAMs using the internet for voice is cheating somehow. I don't know much about it though. Ken Hohhof wrote: > We do that at a tower for a ham club voice repeater, they never use much > bandwidth, nowhere near 20x20, not even 1M. > > They are doing something different, or more likely just don't know how > much they need, or are just asking for the sky because why not? > > > -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Head > Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2016 8:04 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [AFMUG] HAMSs and Internet > > I think a few of the list members out there are HAMs so I need some > advice please. > I support our local HAM group and have allowed them to place repeaters > on two of my towers > at no charge to their group. Now one of their members has asked for > Internet service at one of the > sites for HAM use. I have heard something about HAMs using the Internet > to "talk" so I guess this is > not unusual. > For me the kicker is that he is asking for 20x20Mbps service...I > certainly have the capacity but > that just seems excessive. > Opinions anyone? > > >
