They ran it early on in their trials and then realized it basically
wasn't a sustainable practice for them.

Now that they are their own entity, they actually have to have
positive cashflow :P

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:26 PM, Josh Luthman
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh wow didn't realize they had a minimal price in a different market.  KC
> and Austin are that way, probably an expectation of the government bringing
> them in.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Feb 22, 2016 10:21 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Ah, I thought they changed that before Austin.
>>
>> In Atlanta, and all other new markets the lowest plan is $50/mo for
>> 100Mbps with no install fee with a 1 year contract.
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Josh Luthman
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Pretty close...
>> >
>> > $0/mo
>> >
>> > $300 construction fee. One time payment or $25/mo for 12 months.
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> > On Feb 22, 2016 9:57 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It's not free
>> >>
>> >> On Feb 22, 2016 8:48 PM, "Josh Luthman" <[email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Because media headlight.  Not to mention 2/3 of the complaints were
>> >>> Google.  My guess is because they're doing more work since anyone
>> >>> would pick
>> >>> up customers when it's free service!
>> >>>
>> >>> Josh Luthman
>> >>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> >>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >>> 1100 Wayne St
>> >>> Suite 1337
>> >>> Troy, OH 45373
>> >>>
>> >>> On Feb 22, 2016 9:44 PM, "Adam Moffett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Why is Google's fiber construction headline worthy, and not anybody
>> >>>> else's?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 2/22/2016 9:17 PM, Jaime Solorza wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> http://www.govtech.com/dc/articles/Google-Fiber-Installation-in-Austin-Causes-Damage-Disruption.html
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >

Reply via email to