Sell the sizzle On Feb 24, 2016 9:47 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Oh I'll watch Connor. I think he really does train his ass off and he's a > rare talent. He sells himself like Ali did. Would still like to see him > lose, but it won't be Diaz. Maybe Frankie, maybe RDA, not Cerrone. Josh > Thompson would likely beat him, and nobody likes fighting 5th round Lawler. > Still, he has impressive skills and knows how to sell a fight. > On Feb 24, 2016 10:40 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> That was a joke...it pained me to watch it... >> On Feb 24, 2016 9:38 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> But then we ended up with McGregor vs Diaz... >>> >>> And the freak show that was Dada-5000 vs Kimbo :( >>> On Feb 24, 2016 10:34 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes as in anything we have good and not so good...my point was that HAM >>>> folks have had systems operating when no one else did and it makes sense >>>> that emergency agencies have knowledge and relationship with local folks >>>> just in case your state of the art system fails. Look at how thinking out >>>> of the box saved astronauts way back then...or poor analogy...when UFC >>>> first came out...all these high rank black belts got whooped by skinny >>>> juijitsu guy....now they have adapted and evolved...same thing to me...fuck >>>> the politics... make it work. Period >>>> On Feb 24, 2016 8:46 PM, "Colin Stanners" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Well it's true there's a huge variety of people and experience in the >>>>> ham community, it's certain there will be some that suck, and so it's a >>>>> risk getting involved without good research first. >>>>> >>>>> But in general, they - or I should say us hams- have a very nice >>>>> combination of tower sites, active hardware, spare hardware, RF knowledge >>>>> and eagerness for community service so as to respond rapidly in any >>>>> situation. >>>>> >>>>> I just hope more hams will evolve from old voice / kilobit-speed >>>>> packet networks to new 2.3 / 5.9ghz IP systems so as to keep pushing >>>>> boundaries and advancing the hobby. >>>>> On Feb 24, 2016 9:00 PM, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm guessing Lewis and one or two others have had some sort of bad >>>>>> dealing with a HAM and now hate the all forever for any impractical >>>>>> reason. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ----- >>>>>> Mike Hammett >>>>>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>>>>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>>>>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>>>>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>>> *From: *"Lewis Bergman" <[email protected]> >>>>>> *To: *[email protected] >>>>>> *Sent: *Wednesday, February 24, 2016 8:33:56 PM >>>>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Tessco Show >>>>>> >>>>>> FirstNet is a joke. Hardly anyone has reached DHS' level 6 >>>>>> interoperability and they are going to replace all that hardware at a >>>>>> cost >>>>>> by some estimates of over $10 billion.There have been several hair >>>>>> brained >>>>>> schemes to pay for it but nobody has proposed a plan that is likely to >>>>>> succeed. The only viable option seems to let the carriers do it. Great, >>>>>> just what we need: a public safety system with all the reliability of our >>>>>> cell systems. >>>>>> Back on the HAM topic huh? The reason they don't like running >>>>>> exercises with them is that they are a crap shoot. Some are great, some >>>>>> are >>>>>> complete jokes. Nobody wants to be graded with the wildcard in the mix. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 5:34 PM Jaime Solorza < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> well I attended some interesting sessions. The Public safety one >>>>>>> had several speakers from industry , gov't and academia... >>>>>>> Learned allot and will share some important items later but I asked >>>>>>> a question that really caught them off guard.....there was no mention of >>>>>>> any testing or work on their disaster scenarios which involved HAM radio >>>>>>> guys. One of the members acknowledged that during Katrina and Bastrop >>>>>>> emergencies...the HAM radio network was the only available in many >>>>>>> places >>>>>>> and then asked why they never mentioned using 4.9 GHz but only 2.4 and >>>>>>> 5GHz...mu ch more to come about First Net and testing to be done on >>>>>>> dangerous border.....Canada and US is April. >>>>>>> Lots of stuff to share and some new antenna players I never saw >>>>>>> before. >>>>>>> Met Sakid Ahmed from Cambium and chatted for an hour ...learned some >>>>>>> cool things.. >>>>>>> Well late lunch and Tecate beckons....chime in later,,,,,talk >>>>>>> amongst yourselves..topic is LMR over IP and IoT.... >>>>>>> laters >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jaime Solorza >>>>>>> Wireless Systems Architect >>>>>>> 915-861-1390 >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>
