Telrad (and probably other flavors of LTE) will penetrate MANY trees and still achieve high data rates.
Cambium PMP450 3.65 will penetrate a tree, maybe a few trees but will slow down to 1x or 2x. That's what our side by side real world testing has shown on our network. 2 cents -Sean On Wednesday, March 16, 2016, CBB - Jay Fuller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hate being a decision maker sometimes. > > Love the cambium pmp450 roadmap. I know several people are using pmp450 > in 3.65 and it works. I also see now that a panel antenna is available > based on the 450i in 3.65 > > I may have fallen in love with lte. Haven't seen the telrad talk yet. > Hear the new vendor does lte for roughly what we started our 900 network > for back in 2004. > > Why would I choose lte over cambium ? > Would I? I think the cambium pmp450 (in 3.65) has a better roadmap....one > gig aps by like 2017..... > > What if I choose the wrong product? > > Convince me..... > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE Smartphone > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Jeff Broadwick - Lists" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > To: <[email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> > Subject: [AFMUG] 450M > Date: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 10:02 AM > > 450i is backwards compatible with 450 today. > > Jeff Broadwick > ConVergence Technologies, Inc. > 312-205-2519 Office > 574-220-7826 Cell > [email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > On Mar 16, 2016, at 9:36 AM, Brian Sullivan <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > > Just like FSK? > > On 3/16/2016 7:40 AM, Chuck McCown wrote: > > Backwards compatibility. > > With existing 450 > > >
