Yes, AirFiber is the same team that Moto used to make a lot of their high end products.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Mathew Howard <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm pretty sure Mimosa actually is 802.11 based, but yeah the airFiber > certainly is not. > > Also, do NOT compare airFiber quality with anything else UBNT makes... it's > on a completely different level than the airMax stuff. > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Mimosa isn't 802.11 based as far as I know. UBNT is doing this on >> AirFiber FPGA. Who's making 802.11 based 11G radios? >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:32 AM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >> > is anyone else concerned about the quality and reliability that comes >> > with >> > these low cost 802.11 based 11ghz radios?? >> > >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> When we bought our SAF stuff a few years back, we had to show our >> >> distributor our coordination docs before they would ship gear. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lewis Bergman >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > I don't know about turning sellers into enforcement arms of the FCC. >> >> > All >> >> > of >> >> > that is really the FCC's job. Has there really been a problem? >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 10:17 AM Cassidy B. Larson <[email protected]> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> That would be an awesome idea to limit random joes from lighting up >> >> >> un-registered/coordinated links. But shouldnt they do that for 3.65 >> >> >> as >> >> >> well? >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Brian Sullivan >> >> >> > <[email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Can't they force some sort of compliance with license keys you get >> >> >> > after >> >> >> > you prove your FCC application/coordination? >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > > >
