After the tongue lashing they've got over the last few years with DFS and product delays, I'd think UBNT has learned their lesson. Nobody in their organization is using the word SOON ever again! HAHAHA.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> wrote: > If you watch over the next couple of months, there will be some products > they announce AFTER they're already in the chain. :) > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Dennis Burgess <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Should be shipping Summer 2017! J lol >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> [image: DennisBurgessSignature] >> >> www.linktechs.net – 314-735-0270 x103 – [email protected] >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mathew Howard >> *Sent:* Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:02 PM >> *To:* af <[email protected]> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] UBNT new product >> >> >> >> I'm beginning to wonder, why do we even care? :P >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:59 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> Look at pic. Cut off one of those N connectors. Past the cut N connector >> down the side and width of the radio. Figure out l/w of regular N >> connector. Multiply. >> >> End result = close enough :) >> >> On Mar 17, 2016 12:54 PM, "Mathew Howard" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> It does look like it's a bit bigger to me, but probably still relatively >> small (as far as 11ghz radios go). >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Nate Burke <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hard to get scale from that pic though. >> >> >> >> On 3/17/2016 12:26 PM, Jeremy wrote: >> >> Pic: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> When you say form factor I am thinking is it more like AF24/HD or more >> like AFx. It's obviously connectorized and more like X, but likely thicker >> to handle the N bulkheads. As far as absolute dimensions, I don't think >> those have been documented or mentioned anywhere. >> >> On Mar 17, 2016 12:22 PM, "Nate Burke" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Is it the same form factor? I can't see 2 N-Connectors fitting on the >> current form factor. Maybe same shape but dimensionally bigger? >> >> The Sales Email from UBNT says available Summer 2016. >> >> >> On 3/17/2016 12:19 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote: >> >> Yes no unsure, I believe by summer >> >> On Mar 17, 2016 12:16 PM, "Josh Baird" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I missed the UBNT session.. Is the form-factor of this radio the same as >> the other AirFiberX radios? Does it have a SFP interface? When will they >> be available? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> There was discussion about waveguide - I pushed for it. I mentioned >> the RF Elements adapters as well... >> >> In the end, it was decided that N connectors were more universal and >> adaptable to various antennas. >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:03 PM, George Skorup <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Yup, I believe the B11 is ac based. The AF will do true FDD so you can >> > license standard coordinated channel pairs. And to top it off, they >> went the >> > Exalt path with field replaceable diplexers. And looks like you can >> reverse >> > the diplexer for high or low side. >> > >> > The N connector thing is kinda odd. As Chuck said, they would've been >> better >> > off with SMA @ 11GHz. Or even better, a f'n waveguide interface! C'mon >> UBNT! >> > >> > On 3/17/2016 10:40 AM, Mathew Howard wrote: >> > >> > I'm pretty sure Mimosa actually is 802.11 based, but yeah the airFiber >> > certainly is not. >> > >> > Also, do NOT compare airFiber quality with anything else UBNT makes... >> it's >> > on a completely different level than the airMax stuff. >> > >> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Mimosa isn't 802.11 based as far as I know. UBNT is doing this on >> >> AirFiber FPGA. Who's making 802.11 based 11G radios? >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:32 AM, TJ Trout <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > is anyone else concerned about the quality and reliability that comes >> >> > with >> >> > these low cost 802.11 based 11ghz radios?? >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 8:28 AM, Josh Reynolds <[email protected] >> > >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> When we bought our SAF stuff a few years back, we had to show our >> >> >> distributor our coordination docs before they would ship gear. >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lewis Bergman >> >> >> <[email protected]> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > I don't know about turning sellers into enforcement arms of the >> FCC. >> >> >> > All >> >> >> > of >> >> >> > that is really the FCC's job. Has there really been a problem? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016, 10:17 AM Cassidy B. Larson < >> [email protected]> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> That would be an awesome idea to limit random joes from lighting >> up >> >> >> >> un-registered/coordinated links. But shouldnt they do that for >> 3.65 >> >> >> >> as >> >> >> >> well? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Mar 17, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Brian Sullivan >> >> >> >> > <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Can't they force some sort of compliance with license keys you >> get >> >> >> >> > after >> >> >> >> > you prove your FCC application/coordination? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
